Year: 2024

1. An individual cannot leave the US prior to the advance parole being approved if intending to return on advance parole

A reader asks:
Currently H-1B Extension has been Approved. The lawyer is preparing to submit I-485 this week, and plans to return home after having his fingerprints taken, which is expected to be at the end of November or early December. In the case of renewing a visa sticker in China, if you want to submit AP (double insurance) and leave the country before AP is approved, will the AP application be automatically canceled? It is said online that the AP’s pending departure will be canceled before approval, but will the AP’s pending departure be canceled if there is an H-1B?

Alan Lee answers:
The rules of advance parole are that an individual cannot leave the US prior to the advance parole being approved if intending to return on advance parole. We recently heard of a situation in which an individual did just that – file for advance parole, leave the US prior to its approval, and on returning to the US with a subsequently approved advance parole, had the I-485 adjustment of status application denied. Thus, having an advance parole is not double insurance if leaving before its approval. If approved before you leave, then it may very well be your double insurance. In the situation of an individual with valid H-1B visa and valid advance parole, the choice is up to that individual as to which document to use to reenter the US. We have heard tales that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers may express a preference as to which one they will be willing to accept, but generally, the choice will be yours where you have two valid documents for entry.

2. A prevailing wage determination is required to begin the case 

A reader asks,
I joined my current company in February 2022. Currently, companies require employees to work for one year before they can apply for a green card. Due to various reasons, I have delayed starting PWD until now. Now I have a few questions: 1. When is the salary of PWD determined based on the position? Is it the current job or the job when the company accepted me? I was promoted to Senior Researcher in August this year, so the two prevailing wages should be different. Are the YOE requirements on PERM calculated based on when you first joined the company? Previously, the company drew H-1B on a part-time basis. Although I have worked for two years, I do not have 2 years of experience. Will this affect PWD? Is it OK to get EVL before advertising? Is the PWD process not required?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Under PERM labor certification, a prevailing wage determination is required to begin the case to ensure that the employer will be paying prevailing wages for the offered position. The wage is based upon the position which is being offered in the labor certification application, not necessarily your current job. If you were promoted to senior researcher last year and the company is beginning your labor certification now, it should be sponsoring you for the job that it intends for you to take on permanently, and so should give the corresponding job description for the PWD determination. If experience is required, the company will also set the requirements there in terms of months or years. The requirements of course should ensure that you are eligible for your own labor certification in terms of education, experience, and special skills. In the labor certification application, the PWD is a required part of the process. In terms of obtaining an employment verification letter (EVL) before advertising, that is always a good idea, and an even better idea is to obtain one prior to sending in the PWD request.

3. It is not a necessity to contact USCIS to cancel the F-1 approval if you have an I-485 receipt

A reader asks,
My children are in college and their current status is H-4. Since I am about to turn 21, I submitted I-539 to USCIS in June to change status from H-4 to F-1. It was not approved in October, and I received an RFE saying I-20. If the start date has expired, the school will need to issue a new I-20, and you will also need to pay a student registration fee of 200 yuan. As a result, when the child was applying for a new I-20 with the school, we could submit the I-485, so after submitting the I-485 application, we no longer had to worry about the F-1 RFE. Currently, the I-485 receipt has been received, but the child’s F-1 has also been approved. We did not supplement the RFE and do not know why USCIS approved the F-1 in this case. After consulting with the school, the school said that the I-485 receipt can maintain legal status. So, do we need to contact USCIS to cancel F-1?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
The school’s advice is correct that the I-485 receipt of your child will allow the child to remain in the US as you all await the decision on your I-485s. It is not a necessity to contact USCIS to cancel the F-1 approval, and in some ways, it may be best not to do anything to disturb that adjudication. Whether your child decides to continue going to school or not will not affect his adjustment of status. Kindly note that he is not allowed to work unless he receives employment permission from the school or in connection with an employment authorization application based upon the adjustment of status application.

4. EB-3 would typically take 3-5 years to complete

A reader asks:
I studied for a PhD in China and am now a postdoc in the United States, with a contract until the end of next year. In May this year, I submitted NIW and it was approved. The boss of my laboratory has no grants recently, and he is not sure whether the contract can be renewed at the end of next year. I may need to return to China to wait for the appointment. I am a STEM major and have a 2-year residency requirement. My husband has a bachelor’s degree in China, and the American employer may want to apply for EB-3 for him in order to retain him. We are hesitant now and don’t know whether to let his boss do it for him. If so, what issues need to be paid attention to and considered?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Questions for you primarily depend upon whether you are able to obtain a waiver of the two-year home residence requirement, whether you will be able to keep up your activities in the NIW field, and what effect serving out the two-year residence in China if unable to obtain a waiver may have on your case. I assume that your NIW petition was a self petition, and not one in which the US employer was listed as the petitioner. In such former circumstance, you should continue to work in the field in which you received the I-140 approval and be ready to show a level of activity in your field at interview if you must return to China for two years.

With reference to your husband’s proposed EB-3 employment opportunity, that type of case would typically take 3-5 years to complete assuming no complications given the present slow speed of visa processing in that category for China born. If he is under J-2 dependent status, he will also have the same two-year home residence requirement. If so, and he has to serve the two-year residence requirement in China, he would be allowed to immigrate at the end as long as the employer is still willing to support his case. His EB-3 case would involve a PERM labor certification, I-140 petition, and either adjustment of status (if not subject to the two-year requirement or having a waiver of it) or consular processing.

An EB-3 case for your husband gives you and your husband two opportunities to immigrate to the US, although it may be longer timewise than yours. However, the time difference may not be that much due to due to employment category availability dates. In the month of April 2024, visa bulletin final action dates under which adjustment of status or consular processing cases can be finally approved for China born are up to February 1, 2020 for EB-2 and September 1, 2020 for EB-3.

1. USCIS would not expedite work authorization unless one of the five conditions exists

A reader asks:
I submitted I-485 for EB-1B in June. The main applicant has a work visa, which is still valid for more than two years. I would like to ask if it is possible for the secondary card to pass the expedited comb due to financial loss? Because if you review it carefully, you will probably find that the main applicant has a job. It is speculated that it may be helpful to have two children, which will make the burden heavier.

Alan Lee, Esq. answers:
It does not sound like financial hardship where your spouse already has a job and a work visa even if you have two children and a heavier burden. So that is not in my opinion a good reason to expedite your green card case. In addition, a dependent green card cannot be approved before that of the principal applicant. In your situation, it would appear that you can apply for employment authorization based upon the I-485 adjustment of status filing. If your husband is holding H-1B status, you are eligible to apply also for employment authorization as the spouse of a H-1B holder who has an approved I-140 petition. In both situations, USCIS would not expedite work authorization unless one of the following conditions exists:

• Severe financial loss to a company or person, provided that the need for urgent action is not the result of the petitioner’s or applicant’s failure: (1) to timely file the benefit request; or (2) to timely respond to any requests for additional evidence;
• Emergencies and urgent humanitarian reasons;
• Nonprofit organization (as designated by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)) whose request is in furtherance of the cultural or social interests of the United States;
• U.S. government interests (including cases identified as urgent by federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the U.S. Department of State (DOS), DHS, or other public safety or national security interests); or
• Clear USCIS error.

2. EB-1A denied, maybe wait until you have developed new circumstances that may strengthen your case before submitting a new petition 

A reader asks:
I submitted EB-1A to TSC in July and responded to the request further evidence in August. I just learned that my EB-1A was denied. My attorney told me that the officer who adjudicated my case had an approval rate of 14% in 2023, so it was not surprising that my case was denied. However, my attorney suggested me to wait for 3 to 4 months before refiling to avoid the same officer to adjudicate my case again.

Now I have two choices: 1. Wait for 4 months before refiling to TSC; 2. Submit it now to NSC. I inquired my lawyer for advice and he told me he had no opinion and that I should make a decision on my own decisio. He just told me that my denial will not affect the next application, and whether a case is approved depends largely on the adjudicating officer.

Therefore, I feel like I should submit many applications as if you submit many application, even if I get denied many times, I just need to be lucky enough to be approved once. Please tell me, should I wait for another 4 months to refile again to TSC, or should I refile to NSC immediately?

Alan Lee, Esq. answers:
No one is certain of approval when submitting EB-1A petitions and how an officer may view the evidence presented of extraordinary ability short of a Nobel prize or Oscar (and we have heard of USCIS giving such a petition a difficult time even when the petitioner did have an Oscar in one of the nonmajor categories). I note that the I-140 petition requests information on prior filings which means that an officer has the opportunity to look over your past filing. Unless you truly believe that you had a very strong case that was wrongly rejected, our opinion is that you may wish to wait until you have developed new circumstances that may strengthen your case before submitting a new petition to USCIS.

3. Whether to move forward now with NIW petition

A reader asks:
My wife and I just came to the United States. We are currently studying for a Ph.D. and have some papers and citations. I have consulted with a lawyer and found out that I can apply for NIW under current conditions. I don’t know whether to apply as soon as possible or wait until I graduate soon? There are several tangled points: 1. According to the current queuing speed of NIW, will I not be able to get in line after completing my PhD? 2. The visa is for 5 years. If I apply for I-140, is there any risk in returning to my country? My wife is F-2, does it have no impact on her return to China?

Alan Lee, Esq. answers,
NIW is under the EB-2 category and the current date of availability (when an immigrant visa or adjustment of status can be granted for those who have approved NIW petitions with USCIS) is for petitions filed earlier than January 1, 2020. So there is a significant waiting time after submission of your case. That being said, having a PhD may strengthen the NIW petition, especially if the PhD is in the STEM sciences. So you should take these factors into account in deciding whether to move forward now with your NIW petition. The other factor that you ask about is the risk of traveling back to the home country, China, during the process as you have a visa for five years. Generally speaking, persons with visas do not have to apply for new ones at US consulates or embassies and do not experience problems coming back into the US. That being said, you may wish to keep abreast of developments involving Chinese students on PhD degree programs involving research, some of whom have been experiencing difficulties with Customs and Border Protection officers on reentering the country. That may apply more to you than to your wife, and I do not expect that that would be much of an issue if your wife is traveling alone.

4. The rescheduling of biometrics should not greatly affect the speed of your processing

A reader asks:
I estimate that I can pass form BROW and submit I-485 in October. However, due to an emergency at home, I plan to return to my country after submitting the I-485. The reserved H-1B has been checked, and it is very likely that I will not be able to take fingerprints in time, so I will most likely need to reschedule. My PD is September 12, 2022. ROW’s form A is not current yet. Will doing this cause it to turn green slowly?

Mr. Lee answers:
USCIS cannot approve an employment based I-485 until the priority date becomes current. Even then, USCIS has its own backlog processing time even when the date becomes current as it does not have enough hands to process all cases when they become current. So the rescheduling of biometrics should not greatly affect the speed of your processing even though the agency in our experience does not continue processing cases and their related applications until biometrics are completed. In the past, requesting rescheduling could sometimes result in cases being denied as USCIS officers did not coordinate the request for rescheduling with the application. That has hopefully been largely resolved by the agency’s recent update to rescheduling wherein applicants are invited to make their own online rescheduling requests to USCIS through their existing online account or by creating an online account. Good reasons for requesting a rescheduling as per the USCIS policy manual are:

• Illness, medical appointment, or hospitalization;
• Previously planned travel;
• Significant life events such as a wedding, funeral, or graduation ceremony;
• Inability to obtain transportation to the appointment location;
• Inability to obtain leave from employment or caregiver responsibilities; and
• Late delivered or undelivered biometric services appointment notice.

1. If you add the skill set yourself to an already-signed letter , then this is fraud, your application may be denied, and may face criminal penalties.

A reader asks:
Currently, I am still in the PWD stage, and I discovered that my former company missed a whole Skills set section in the Experience letter. The lawyer said it must be exactly the same as the template details and skills he provided. The troublesome thing is that the HR of my former company is very annoying and has poor professional skills. He did not write according to the template provided by my lawyer at all, and he has not yet sent me an experience letter. If I add this skills set myself, will the Immigration Bureau treat it as fraud? Will it result in an RFE for I-140?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers,
I will note that each company or attorney writes their prior experience letters on behalf of employment-based green card applicants for former employees differently. That being said, the reason that these letters is written is so that the green card applicant has evidence backing their claims of being qualified for an employment position used in a green card application. For example, if a petitioning employer’s Software Developer position requires “Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science + 2 years as a software developer including use of Python and Ruby on Rails,” then the permanent resident applicant employee must provide evidence that he/she has the Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, as well as the 2 years of experience as a software developer including the use of the two aforementioned technologies. So in order for it to be useful, a prior experience verification letter by a former employer should mention that the applicant had worked as a Software Developer for 2 years full-time (list dates), and state duties/responsibilities that clearly show that the applicant had experience using Python and Ruby on Rails while on the job.

In the case of the HR of your former company, you or your attorney may draft the letter including your responsibilities and skills so as to clearly show that you acquired some of the skills and experience qualifying you for your green card position at this previous position. If you or the attorney drafts the letter, and then the HR department signs it, then that will work for USCIS since your previous company was willing to attest to your experience. If you add the skill set yourself to an already-signed letter that they did not attest to, then this is fraud and your application may be denied, and in addition you may face criminal penalties. If USCIS doubts the authenticity of the letter, it may issue an RFE asking you to obtain further verification from the company, and make further showings that you are indeed qualified for the green card position.

If your former employer is unwilling to sign off on a letter verifying your experience, you should work with them to see what they are willing to attest to (i.e.—are they willing to attest to your dates of employment and your title, but not your specific job duties? Or merely willing to attest just to your dates of employment, as sometimes HR departments are only willing to do?) If you are unable to obtain a signed letter from your previous employer, or have a signed letter that only verifies portions of what is needed to meet your requirements, you may have others (such as a coworker, peer, or anyone else who can attest to your employment) write letters verifying your experience, stating their relationship to you and how they know that you had the experience. Additionally, you may provide old work samples if any to serve as further evidence of that experience. You may also sign an affidavit yourself that you were employed at the former employer, what position you had, for how long, and what specific responsibilities you had and skills you acquired. However, the likelihood of an RFE increases if you are unable to submit a signed letter verifying your experience in its entirety from your previous employer.

2. A J-1 requirement is an intent to return home at the end of the J-1 stay

A reader asks:
After I graduated with a Ph.D. in the United States, I used OPT to work in the United States for two years. Later, I left the United States due to the epidemic and worked in Europe. I recently got a postdoctoral offer from an American university and applied for an American J-1 visa in Europe. I applied for NIW overseas earlier this year and my attorney filed Form I-140 last week. The current status is that it has been received and the receipt number has been obtained. However, the DS-160 form for my J-1 visa has not been submitted yet, and I am very anxious now. If I apply for J-1 again, will it be rejected instantly due to my immigration tendency? Is it not safe to apply for J-1 and it is better to apply for H-1B or B-1 instead?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers:
While it is not certain that your J-1 will be denied, your immigrant intent with your filed I-140 may be hard to overcome in your J-1 application since, as you know, a J-1 requirement is an intent to return home at the end of the J-1 stay. You must overcome the evidence of immigrant intent by demonstrating that you plan to return home upon the completion of your J-1. This can be done by showing your ties to your country of residence such as a deed or lease, family ties, employment ties, a return ticket, and anything else that would demonstrate that you intend to return home after the expiry of your J-1. However, it is ultimately up to the discretion of an officer as to whether to grant the J-1 visa and believe your intent to return home, and a filed I-140 is often challenging to overcome when it comes to demonstrating nonimmigrant intent. Also, with a J-1 visa, you should also check whether you will be subject to any 2-year residency requirement. A 2 year residency requirement may delay your ability to take up permanent residence in the United States even after your priority date becomes current. In applying for a B-1 visa, you would face the same challenges in terms of proving nonimmigrant intent. There is not much more benefit in trying to apply for a B-1 than a J-1. If you are eligible for an H-1B either as a cap-exempt applicant or as somebody who wins the cap lottery, the H-1B visa would be a good option for you as it is a dual intent visa where your NIW application will not pose a problem.

3. The general rule of thumb with the Department of State is that if you cannot obtain a required document, you must submit a detailed written explanation

A reader asks:
My parents applied for a green card overseas and after filling out the parent information DS-260 form online, it showed that in addition to my parents’ birth certificate, my birth certificate, and my parents’ marriage notarization, they also needed my marriage certificate. My original marriage certificate is no longer available, only a copy. Will my application be rejected if I don’t have the original documents during the parents’ interview? Because it is shown above that all uploaded electronic versions need to be provided with notarized originals during the interview.

Arthur Lee Esq. answers:
While your marriage certificate would not seem to be that important of a document in your parents’ cases to require the original document, the general rule of thumb with the Department of State is that if you cannot obtain a required document, you must submit a detailed written explanation to the consulate as to why this document cannot be obtained. If you were married in the US, you should be able to obtain a certified copy of this marriage certificate through contacting the city or state clerk of the place you were married. If you were married in China, your parents can try to go to the appropriate government agency there to obtain your original notarial marriage certificate. This would typically be the local marriage registration office of the local civil affairs bureau of the jurisdiction where the marriage took place. Otherwise, your parents can go to the interview armed with a notarized detailed explanation by you as to why you could not obtain the original marriage certificate, and any further evidence you can provide such as your correspondences with the appropriate agency for the marriage certificate. The interviewing officer may grant the immigrant visas for your parents at his/her discretion even without the marriage certificate, or he/she may determine that your parents should obtain your marriage certificate and give a denial for lack of documents which can be overcome when your parents submit the marriage certificate or give further evidence why the original is not available.

1. EB-1 main applicant in the US under O-3 can submit I-485 once the I-140 priority date is current

I am in China, and my EB-1A PD is in April 2023, but my child will graduate junior high school in another year. I want my child to go to a public high school in the US as early as possible, but the current schedule predicts that it will be difficult to land within 2 years, which will delay my child’s high school enrollment. It is inconvenient for the EB-1A main applicant to apply, but the conditions for the O-1 spouse are similar to those of the main applicant. Can my spouse apply for O-1, and my children and I apply for O-3? At that time, while the main applicant is waiting for the I-140 current, can he submit the I-485 in China as an O-3?

Arthur Lee, Esq. answers,
As long as your wife meets the eligibility requirements of O-1 on her own (not through your accomplishments as a dependent), she can apply for O-1 status with you and your children as O-3 dependents. Please note that the eligibility conditions of the O-1 spouse are not similar to those as the main applicant. The O-1 applicant needs to independently establish eligibility (e.g. extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, athletics, arts or extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or TV industry)—the spouse applicant needs to show a bona fide marriage to the principal O-1 applicant. So unless your wife can demonstrate her own eligibility for O-1 status, your plan would not work. If she can demonstrate that she has extraordinary ability in one of the above fields and meets all other criteria for O-1, then she can be the O-1 principal, and you and your children can be O-3 dependents. If the O-1/O-3 petition is successful, then your wife will be admitted to the United States to work with her petitioning employer or agent under the employment conditions stated in the O-1 petition. Then you and your children will be admitted as O-3 dependents. As an O-3 dependent, you will not have work authorization, but your children will be allowed to enroll in school. Please note that you would not be in O-3 status until you arrived in the United States—upon your wife’s O-1 approval, you would be eligible to enter the United States and “activate” your O-3 status. While you are in the United States under O-3, you can submit your I-485 application once your I-140 priority date is current. If you are still in China, you can wait until your priority date is current and then apply for an immigrant visa via Form DS-260. But an I-485 is reserved for those who are already in the United States.

2. To verify the applicant’s experience, the Immigration Bureau can call the previous employer

Will the Immigration Bureau really send or call the former company for verification? If there is a small discrepancy in the employment verification letter, will it result in an I-140 audit? Is this used when applying for I-140? Or is it when PERM advertises? If my former employer does not add skills set to me, is it necessary to file a lawsuit?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers,
It is possible that USCIS calls your former employer who writes you a prior experience affidavit to truly verify your experience, especially if it has reason to doubt the legitimacy of the affidavit. If there is a small discrepancy in your letter, USCIS may either call the company to ensure that you acquired the skills and remained in the stated position for the time that the letter attests—in this case, USCIS may also ask the company how they know what they are attesting to in the letter. It may also issue a request for further evidence (not an audit) offering you an opportunity to explain the discrepancies and clarify other issues in your I-140 case. The employment verification letter is indeed used when you are filing an I-140, not when the PERM ETA 9089 is submitted. You would not win any lawsuit against your former company for not adding a skills set for you. Whether they are willing to attest to your particular skills, responsibilities, titles or dates of employment is entirely up to your former company.

3. It is more advantageous to submit NIW after obtaining a PhD

My conditions are not very favorable. I have a master’s degree from the United States and am currently studying for a PhD. I am considering whether to apply for a green card and when to apply, so I contacted several law firms, but after seeing the responses from the law firms, I am now hesitant whether to do NIW after the PhD graduation article is sent out, or to do it now. Core contradiction: Apply again when you have a new paper after PhD graduation vs. apply now?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers,
The answer to this really depends on how much evidence you currently possess that you are well-positioned to advance your field of endeavor, that your field of endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, and that on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer. While I cannot speak to whether your proposed endeavor has substantial merit/national importance as you do not specify what your Master’s and PhD degrees are in, and what type of work you are proposing to do, whether you have a PhD when you apply will factor into the second and third prongs (that you are well-positioned to advance your field of endeavor, and on balance, it would be beneficial to waive the requirements of a job offer). In adjudicating whether you are well-positioned, USCIS typically considers evidence such as degrees, certificates, or licenses in the field; your patents, trademarks, or copyright; letters from experts in your field describing your past achievements; published articles or media reports about your achievements or current work; citation history of your works; evidence that you influenced your field of endeavor; correspondence from prospective or potential employers and customers; evidence that you have attained investment from U.S. investors such as venture capitalists; contracts, agreements, or licenses showing potential impact of proposed endeavor; evidence of receiving awards and grants for your work in your field of endeavor; and evidence showing how your work is being used by others. If you have a plethora of the above evidence to meet the second prong, you might be able to submit an NIW application with confidence without finishing your PhD study and dissertation. However, if your evidence is more limited, it would be a good idea to secure the PhD and release your PhD graduation article before submitting an NIW case as that would further demonstrate that you are well-positioned to advance your field of endeavor. Your PhD completion may also be favorable in the adjudication of the third prong (on balance, it would be beneficial to waive the job offer requirement) since having a PhD may enhance the potential benefits to the US from your contributions, even if other U.S. workers were available. However, you should make this evaluation of whether you want to submit your NIW application before or after your PhD completion based upon the balance of the remainder of your evidence, and the overall benefits/risks of filing earlier rather than later for your particular situation.

1. When the quota limit is reached, the visa bulletin dates do retrogress

A reader asks:
It is said that quotas for the next fiscal year will be released in October this year and the schedule will be advanced. However, I have seen many forecasts saying that the schedule is likely to be advanced by 2-4 months. Currently, China’s EB-1A List A is in February 2022. If the new fiscal year starts only 2-4 months ago, shouldn’t this schedule be getting longer and longer and never disappear? I heard that India’s EB-1A schedule has gone back to 10 years ago. I don’t understand. If you can’t handle it, just stop. Why is it going backwards?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers,
At the time of answering this question (January 2024), the EB-1 China Final Action Date is July 1, 2022. As you are probably aware, the visa bulletin dates do not work in a straight line corresponding to calendar dates. Indeed, they sometimes do retrogress. This is due to the fact that Congress sets limits on the number of immigrant visas that can be issued each year (usually 675,000 across all visa categories, and 140,000 for EB-categories), and divides them among foreign nations. It is possible for countries to be oversubscribed—have more visas demanded for specific categories than visas available for the year. This is often the case with EB-categories with respect to China and India. According to the USCIS website, visa retrogression occurs when more people apply for a visa in a particular category or country than there are visas available for that month—and retrogression typically happens toward the end of a fiscal year. The cut-off dates of the visa bulletin are determined by the Department of State after consideration of variables including number of visas used to that point, projected demand for visas, and number of visas remaining under the annual numerical limit for that country/preference category. For India, the EB-1 category is actually up to September 1, 2020 for Chart A. However, when a date retrogresses, it typically means that the Department of State is oversubscribed to the point that there is no visa available for the date that was posted on the visa bulletin for the previous month. DOS/USCIS are then not able to adjudicate cases from a specific priority date (although it had reached that date previously) due to unavailability of visas to fill that date while still granting visas from dates prior to that date.

2. Should Change Job Affect the Validity of an Approved NIW?

The NIW was approved recently, the priority is current, and the I-485 has just been submitted. Can I change jobs in this situation? I have a good job opportunity and want to go to the same industry with the same job content.

Arthur Lee Esq. answers,
Since an NIW does not require a job offer or labor certification, changing employers should not affect the validity of your approved I-140 NIW and you should be able to change jobs without affecting the approvability of your I-485 assuming that your next job is in your proposed field of endeavor stated in your NIW application. Since your job will be in the same industry with the same type of job description, it would be appear acceptable for you to switch to this other opportunity. This answer assumes that you self-petitioned on your EB-2 NIW. If you had an employer petition for you on your EB-2 NIW, you may encounter difficulties with USCIS if you change positions at this time although you may be eligible to port your case 180 days after the I-485 has been filed.

3. NIW Approved But PD not Current, May Come to the US With B1/B2 for a Meeting

A reader asks:
I am planning to work in Canada for a short period of time after applying for NIW. Before I get the priority date of I-140, am I inclined to immigrate? Can I apply for a B1/B2 and come to the United States for a meeting during the waiting period?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers,
I assume that you mean that you have already applied for an NIW and secured a priority date, but it is not yet current. In this case, you would ordinarily wait until your priority date becomes current, assuming your NIW is approved, before you immigrate. This is unless you have another means of immigrating, such as an immediate relative petition or a current family-based petition; or if you come in on a dual intent visa such as an H-1B or L-1 which allows you to have an immigrant intent when you enter the United States. If you need to come to the US for a meeting, you can do so on a B1/B2 visa. However, due to your pending I-140 which shows your intent to eventually immigrate, you will need to clearly demonstrate to a consular officer that you will depart the country and return home after your B-1/B-2 period of stay is over. You can do so by showing that the main purpose of your trip is this business meeting which is a permissible activity under B-1, and that you have ties to your home that you intend to return to such as family, lease or deed, job, and a return plane ticket.

4. My I-140 has been Approved for More Than 18o Days but Was Laid Off.  Will it Be Possible to Retain the Priority Date and Transfer to B-1 to Look For a Job?

A reader asks:
It has been more than 180 days since my I-140 was approved, and the priority date has more than half a year to wait, but I was laid off. If I can’t find a new job within 60 days, transfer to B-1 and continue to look for a job. After finding a job, can I use H-1B transfer to continue to keep the priority date?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers,
You will be able to retain your priority date as long as your approved I-140 is not revoked for fraud, misrepresentation or material error, and your labor certification was not revoked or invalidated. This is regardless of whether you are in or outside the United States. If you fall outside your 60 day grace period in finding a new job after you were laid off, you may apply for a B-1 change of status. Just ensure that your I-539 change of status application is filed before the end of your grace period. During your time in B-1 status, you are allowed to interview for a job. Once you are hired at a position, then you must file an H-1B transfer to your new employer.

5. Submit EB-1A and I-485 need Paystubs and Tax Returns

A reader asks:
I would like to ask, do the recently submitted EB-1A and I-485 still need a three-month paystub or a three-year or one-year W2 or IRS transcript?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers,
Generally, it is a good idea to submit your 3 most recent pay statements and copy of your most recent tax return and W-2. These documents should be submitted to prove that you will be working in your field of expertise as stated in the I-140 and that you will not be a public charge. If you are not working in your field of expertise, you should include evidence that you will be working in your field of expertise such as a signed statement that you intend to work in the field stated in your I-140 along with supporting evidence showing that you are still engaged in that endeavor. If you do not meet the federal poverty guidelines in your most recent tax return for your household size, you may wish to get a financial cosponsor. 

1. Applying EAD Encounters Two Situations

A reader asks:

My PD is at the end of July 2022, and now EB1 Form B can be submitted to I-485 to apply for EAD. Now I encounter two situations and want to ask for advice respectively.
1. My wife came to the United States on a J-2 visa from 2004 to 2006, and the old passport she used has been lost. She then returned to China and came to the United States to study again in 2020, using a new passport. Now that I-485 is submitted, a copy of the previous passport must also be submitted, and the old passport has a stamp for entering and exiting the United States, which can prove that the J-2 meets the two-year service requirement of the home country. However, now the old passport is lost. How should I deal with this situation?

2. My wife is currently a student with an F-1 visa and is expected to graduate by the end of next year. She is currently being interviewed for an intern in the summer next year. If I submit the I-485 together with me now, if I want to intern next summer, will I have to activate the I-485 combo card? She can no longer apply for an OPT EAD card. If I submit the I-485 separately now and submit it to her when the deadline is approaching, she might be able to apply for OPT EAD first and then get the combo, or should I submit the I-485 together now while she is intern? Also use I-485 EAD?

Mr. Lee answers,
To your first question, your wife can present a copy of the dependent  DS-2019 form that she had when she came to the US under the J-2 visa; her affidavit explaining what she was doing from 2006 to 2020; and backing that up with whatever evidence that she has of her residence in China or any other country including any subsequent passports that she may have applied for and received outside of the United States.

To your second question, I do not see any disadvantage in filing I-485 applications for both of you at this time. You can both apply for employment authorization cards. I note that we have been seeing USCIS move faster on approving EAD cards based on I-485 filings, most coming well before six months in uncomplicated cases. In addition, USCIS is now giving five years validity time to EAD’s s based upon adjustment.

2. A Renewal of the H-1B Visa in Canada Should Not Be a Problem

A reader asks:
I applied for I-140 and am waiting for approval. However, I still have an H-1B visa in hand, which can last for a while. Even if it expires, I plan to go to Canada to sign it back because I cannot leave the country while waiting for the I-131, which affects my vacation. I would like to ask if there are any disadvantages to submitting I-485 without I-131? For example, will it be slower or something? Can it be only fileI-485, not fileI-131?

Mr. Lee answers:
An I-131 application for advance parole while an I-485 adjustment of status application is pending is purely a benefit and not a detriment. Filing without the advance parole application will not slow the processing of the I-485. With the unexpired H-1B visa, you can travel in and out of the US during the time of processing of the adjustment application. Upon expiration, you should be able to have it renewed since the H-1B is a dual intent visa, allowing an individual to remain in the US on H-1B status while the permanent residence application is pending. Normally a renewal of the H-1B visa in Canada should not be a problem, although US consulates in many countries are wary of giving visas to third country nationals.

3. For an Expiring Combo Card, You Can Make New Applications

A reader asks:
In 2021, when my EB-1A was approved, I still had a pending NIW. In December 2021, I-485 was submitted based on approved EB-1A, and the pending NIW was also withdrawn. Unfortunately, I-485 was still transferred to NSC. In February 2022, there was no movement after the fingerprints were taken. During this period, I also received a NIW withdrawal notice. I received the combo card in June last year. This year I went to congressmen and the White House to urge me, but all I got were template responses from CIS. At this moment, the combo and physical examination are about to expire. what do I do?

Mr. Lee answers:
Unfortunately, USCIS is a money strapped agency and cannot adjudicate all of its cases on a timely basis. That can be seen from the long backlog processing dates that it releases to the public. For an expiring combo card for employment authorization and advance parole, you can make new applications. At this time, there is no additional USCIS filing fee for either application where the I-485 application remains pending. As for the medical examination, it is currently good for two years, and so it is up to you whether to take another one at this time or wait until USCIS is ready to adjudicate and requests a new medical.

4. Premium Processing Application lockbox Address

A reader asks:
I applied for EB-1A for special talents. Last week, UPS sent it to TSC Premium Processing. Today, the entire application was returned. The rejection letter from USCIS said: The fee for the I-129 petition I submitted was incorrect. What’s happening here? I applied for EB-1A and submitted I-140, not I-129 at all. No matter in the I-907, I-140 or cover letter I submitted, it was clearly stated that I was applying for EB-1A. The only thing I can think of is, should I fill in the I-907 and I-140 that I applied for E11? Maybe the people reading it don’t know that EB-1A is E11?

Another possible reason I think is that they thought I sent it to the wrong jurisdiction. I am not in the United States now. When I sent the application, I filled in the mailing address of my previous residence in New Jersey (TSC jurisdiction) and asked the landlord to collect it on my behalf. Physical address is the Chinese address filled in. Maybe they think I can’t send it to TSC using a c/o mailing address in TSC’s jurisdiction. But even so, should a Chinese address be able to send TSC?

Mr. Lee answers:
If you submitted the fees of $700 and $2500, they would be correct fees and USCIS should not have rejected the I-140 petition for alien worker and I-907 premium processing application. It appears that your choice is to send them the same package with an explanation, or to redo the forms and send in the paperwork again. On where to send an application if you are in China, the current address for a person stating an address in New Jersey is:

USCIS Chicago Elgin Lockbox

U.S. Postal Service (USPS):

USCIS
Attn: Premium I-140
P.O. Box 4008
Carol Stream, IL 60197-4008

FedEx, UPS, and DHL deliveries:

USCIS
Attn: Premium I-140 (Box 4008)
2500 Westfield Drive
Elgin, IL 60124-7836

5. Mailing Address and Residential Address

A reader asks:
I am going to apply for I-140. The mailing address (5b-5g) in Part 4 of the form is the Chinese mailing address filled in Chinese. Foreign address (3a-3f) is the Chinese residential address filled in English. Can these two be filled in differently?

Mr. Lee answers:
Mailing address and residential address are many times different. That is the reason for which USCIS gives the two spaces. Many individuals have different mailing addresses for security reasons or because they just prefer that their mail goes to a different address.