Arthur Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on September 29, 2024: 1. If the consular officer or USCIS finds you improperly shared technical knowledge, it may be a ground for denial of your visa or green card. 2. NVC may choose to wait on the fee bill until your priority date is about to become current

1. If the consular officer or USCIS finds you improperly shared technical knowledge, it may be a ground for denial of your visa or green card. 

A reader asks:
Recently, a domestic headhunter and a friend who is starting a business contacted me and suggested that I apply for a national or provincial talent program. If approved, it will be 500,000 RMB per year, and a total of 1.5 million RMB for 3 years. I would like to ask, if applying for such a program will affect the future green card 485 change of status?

Arthur Lee, Esq. answers,
If you take up a position with a national/provincial talent program, your future green card application and your application for a visa at the consulate may face tougher scrutiny given the political climate between the US and China at this time. The US government has been cracking down on foreign talent recruitment programs, which it believes are a mechanism used by foreign countries such as China to bring outside knowledge and innovation back to their countries, including stealing trade secrets, breaking export control laws, or violating conflict-of-interest policies to do so. The FBI notes that while various countries use talent plans, China is the most prolific sponsor of these programs. Therefore, if you work at a talent program, your applications to come to the US on a visa, or adjust status to I-485 may be subject to further investigation into the questions of whether you have improperly exported technical knowledge and trade secrets to China. You will need to be prepared to answer questions about whether you have ever utilized or shared knowledge regarding sensitive US technology secrets and innovations during your time working at the talent program. If the consular officer or USCIS finds that you more likely than not have improperly shared knowledge with the talent program, that may be a ground for denial of your visa or green card application.

2. NVC may choose to wait on the fee bill until your priority date is about to become current

A reader asks:
I applied for NIW and submitted it at the beginning of this year. I applied for expedited application two months later and was approved early March. How long will it take to receive the NVC payment notice? Online status check shows that the case has been transferred to NVC.

Arthur Lee Esq. answers:
Congratulations on your NIW approval. After your I-140 is approved, your case is sent to NVC assuming that you chose consular processing as your means of applying for permanent residence. USCIS notifies NVC that your case has been approved, and instructs it to pre-process you for your permanent residence application through consular processing. Typically, NVC will first send you a welcome notice then contact you with a fee bill within 60 days of your petition approval. But if you are from a country with a long backlog, NVC may choose to wait on the fee bill until your priority date is about to become current. Therefore, if you have not received any communication from NVC, and your priority date is current or about to become current (per the “Date of Filing” chart), you may wish to follow up with NVC.

Article: MUCH EMPLOYMENT BASED (EB) VISA MOVEMENT IN OCTOBER 2024 VISA BULLETIN; USCIS WILL ACCEPT DATES FOR FILING CHART FOR EB ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS CASES.

With the first visa bulletin for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025, there was not much activity in family-based cases, but much for employment-based ones. For both family-based charts (final action dates and dates for filing), the dates were the same as in the September 2024 visa bulletin for Rest of World (ROW) cases. The final action dates chart changes were confined to Mexico and India; and the dates for filing chart changes were specifically for Mexico and the Philippines.

For employment-based cases, the final action dates chart showed EB-1 (ROW) remaining current with China moving up one week to 11/8/22 and India remaining at 2/1/22; EB-2 ROW staying at 3/15/23 with China remaining at 3/22/20 and India 7/15/12; EB-3 ROW advancing almost 2 years to 11/15/22 with China backlogging five months to 4/1/20 and India advancing one week to 11/1/12; EB-3W ROW remaining at 12/1/20 with China remaining at 1/1/17 and India moving up one week to 11/1/12; EB-4 worldwide remaining at 1/1/21 with non-minister certain religious workers becoming unavailable due to lack of extending legislation; EB-5 unreserved remained current with China advancing eight months to 7/15/16 and India one year one month to 1/1/22, and all the reserved EB-5 categories remained current.

For the EB dates for filing chart, EB-1 ROW remained current with China staying at 1/1/23 and India advancing two months one week to 4/15/22; EB-2 ROW advanced four months one week to 8/1/23 with China advancing four months to 10/1/20 and India six months one week to 1/1/13; EB-3 ROW moved up one month to 3/1/23 with China backlogging eight months two weeks to 11/15/20 and India advancing eight months one week to 6/8/13; EB-3W ROW advanced five months two weeks to 5/22/21 with China moving up one year to 1/1/18 and India six months to 6/1/13; EB-4 including certain religious workers worldwide remained at 2/1/21; EB-5 ROW remained current with China moving backwards three months to 10/1/16, India staying at 4/1/22, and all the reserved EB-5 categories remained current.

For adjustment of status, USCIS indicated that it would use the dates for filing chart during the month for both family-based and employment-based cases. This is the first time that USCIS has used the B chart for EB cases since February 2024.

Looking forward, we would all hope that the Department of State continues to use all efforts to make use of all visa numbers as it has been doing during this fiscal year and as evidenced by its closing of numerous employment-based categories and barring further issuance of immigrant visas in them for the balance of the FY 2024 fiscal year.

Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on September 15, 2024: 1. If I-485 is current and past processing times, you can place a service request online 2. A request for reconsideration must come within 30 days of the denial 3. You may request a duplicate receipt on eRequest if you did not receive one 4.  You can use an approved EB-2’s priority date to apply for another employment based petition 5. A NIW petition may affect the renewal of F-1 to return to the United States

1. If I-485 is current and past processing times, you can place a service request online

A reader asks,
In September 2021, the I-485 I submitted was EB-1B and the PD has been current. At present, it has been two years since the approval, and it is still pending. The lawyer said that currently approval is usually within one year. Can I urge USCIS to take a look at the case?

Arthur Lee, Esq. answers,
Processing times for employment-based I-485 cases are different in each local field office and jurisdiction. You should ascertain which local field office or service center is adjudicating your I-485, and then look up the processing times here: https://egov.uscis.gov/processing-times/. I note that in many jurisdictions, including New York City, an employment-based I-485 filed in September 2021 would be past processing times. While there is no way to “urge” USCIS to look at your adjustment of status case, there are mechanisms to check your case.  As your case is past standard processing times, you can place a service request at https://egov.uscis.gov/e-request/Intro.do. Here, you may select “past processing times” and enter in the information on your case and inquire on its status. Although USCIS does not provide time estimates for responses on these types of requests anymore, you can likely expect a response within 30 days, hopefully of some substance. Another alternative is to call the USCIS “contact center” at 1-800-375-5283 to gather status updates on your case and inquire on what progress a USCIS “agent” sees on your case. The USCIS agent may also request that your officer look at your case (same effect as placing a service request online). It is important to keep your records of your service requests and your communications with “contact center” officers; if these requests are unsuccessful or yield unsatisfactory responses, you may do an ombudsman request, in which a DHS ombudsman staff member requests that USCIS looks into your case. Best of luck to you.

2. A request for reconsideration must come within 30 days of the denial

A reader asks,
Today I learned that PERM did not have an audit and was directly rejected. The reason was that one of the skills did not appear in the experience letter of the previous company. It’s an oversight on the part of the lawyer. Now, lawyers suggest reconsidering and re-filing together. Is there a high chance of reconsideration? It’s not that I don’t want to file again. I really don’t know if I can convince my boss to apply for me again in this situation.

Arthur Lee, Esq. answers,
I note that it is not common practice for attorneys to upload prior experience letters to ETA 9089 to the Department of Labor. Signed prior experience letters are typically reserved for the I-140 stage after the ETA 9089 is certified. Based upon your question, I assume that your facts are correct and if that is the case, your attorney prepared the relevant prior experience sections incorrectly in having requirements in your PERM job that were not met by your prior experience, education, or training. Specifically, it seems based off your description that your attorney failed to mention one of your skills in your prior experience summary that was one of the job requirements. In such a case, you may have significant trouble succeeding on a request for reconsideration as such does not allow additional evidence that was not originally filed with the ETA 9089. A request for review at BALCA also does not allow additional evidence. Therefore, unless your attorney’s description of your “skill” in your prior experience and the “skill” required in your PERM position are arguably a match and/or open for interpretation and you can meet the burden of proof in demonstrating that your adjudicator erred in his/her decision, your chances of winning a request for reconsideration appear to be low. Please note that a request for reconsideration must come within 30 days of the denial, and a review by BALCA must also come within 30 days of a denial by DOL or affirmation of the denial on reconsideration.

3. You may request a duplicate receipt on eRequest if you did not receive one

A reader asks: 
I am an EB-2 green card applicant. The application documents for the primary and secondary cards sent by UPS to the lockbox in Chicago in April showed that they had been signed for that month, but so far I have not received the receipt, and the check has not been cashed. I want to ask, is this normal? How long after delivery should I receive the receipt?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers:
Typically after a month, the check(s) will have been cashed and you would have received a filing receipt. You may wish to check whether your filing was sent to the correct address. Please note that filing addresses are different due to a myriad of factors including whether you are filing a standalone I-485; whether you have other applications such as I-765 and I-131 filed concurrently with it; I-485 category, etc. If you have filed your application to the correct address, but have not yet received a receipt, you may wish to call the USCIS contact center and try to locate your file by informing the officer of your “A” number if you have one. If you get a receipt number, that solves the issue, and you may request a duplicate receipt on eRequest if you did not receive one. If USCIS does not have a receipt for your case (which is likely because your check has not been cashed), you can email lockbox support at lockboxsupport@uscis.dhs.gov. In this email, you should include your name, “A” number if you have one, address, telephone number, and how you paid your filing fee. Please explain in your letter that you have sent your case to this lockbox, and it has been delivered and signed for, but that your case has not been receipted yet nor checks cashed. Hopefully through assistance by Lockbox Support USCIS will locate your case. If all else fails, you can refile your case assuming you have kept copies of all evidence–just issue a new payment. If your payment with your initial submission is checked, then contact the bank and cancel your second payment. Best of luck to you.

4.  You can use an approved EB-2’s priority date to apply for another employment based petition

A reader asks,
Since EB-1 also has a waiting period now, if I apply for EB-1 while I already have an EB-2 PD, will my PD be re-established or will the PD of the newly applied EB-1 be the same as the original EB-2 PD? If it is not the original EB-2 PD, will the application be invalidated?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
I will assume that the EB-2 petition has already been approved. If so, and there are no applicable grounds for revocation, you can use the priority date for purposes of applying for another employment based petition, including EB-1. As your EB-1 case is now scheduled, I assume that you have already filed form I-485. Generally to accord an earlier priority date, you would request that the earlier priority date be assigned when you file the new I-140 petition. If you did not, hopefully the officer at the interview will allow for the transfer of priority date. If not and the EB-1 petition was filed without a current priority date, there would be a problem. If filed with a current EB-1 priority date and the date has retrogressed, the I-485 filing would still be valid although you might have to wait for the EB-1 date to again become current again before the officer can make a final adjudication on your case.

5. A NIW petition may affect the renewal of F-1 to return to the United States

A reader asks:
I am in my first year of postdoc OPT, studying for a PhD in the United States, and my current student visa F-1 has expired. I plan to apply for NIW and will it affect my return to the United States after returning to my country? Because F-1 is a non-immigrant visa and applying for NIW has immigration intent, will it affect the renewal of F-1 to return to the United States?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
As you note, a F-1 visa is one requiring nonimmigrant intent. A NIW petition on form I-140 is an immigrant visa petition, a contrary concept. You may have problems renewing the F-1 visa since one of the questions on the DS-160 application form for a nonimmigrant visa is “Has anyone ever filed an immigrant petition on your behalf with the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)? If YES, explain.” It may increase your chances of visa renewal to apply for the NIW petition after returning to the US.

Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on September 8, 2024:1. After being fired and H-1B grace period is up, you can try to return to school to maintain nonimmigrant status 2. Although the new job salary is $20,000 less than before, those I-485 applicants with higher salaries will not be affected 3. Although your consulate office is listed in China, you may be able to have H-1B interview in Europe  

1. After being fired and H-1B grace period is up, you can try to return to school to maintain nonimmigrant status

A reader asks:
The first time I applied for PERM in 2020, I was audited and I submitted supplementary materials. In early 2022, I was notified that it was rejected. The reason for rejection was that the recruitment advertisement did not comply with regulations. In mid-2022, the company was acquired, and the new company ran a second PERM and encountered a hiring freeze. After waiting for 6 months, I submitted the second PERM application in October 2023. However, I was suddenly fired last month and the PERM is still being processed. It is now the 6th year of H1-B and is valid until November. I have interviewed with several companies lately, but after chatting with HR, I was rejected. Some companies require to have I-140 in the 6th year. Some said that the company does not apply for PERM this year. They also contacted the company where I was fired. After the first round of interviews, they arranged for a second round of interviews next week. The result was two days before the interview. HR called and said role restructure, and the interview was canceled. I want to apply for NIW, but I only have a Master’s degree in CS from the US + work experience as a coder. I have not published any papers or participated in academic conferences. There are only more than 30 days left in the 60 day grace period, and I feel like I can no longer find a job due to status issues. What should we do in this situation now?

Arthur Lee, Esq. answers,
Based upon your summary of your education and work experience along with your lack of published papers and academic conferences, I do not believe that you would be eligible for EB-2 NIW. Unfortunately, your pending PERM will no longer be valid since your company laid you off (unless they agree to continue to sponsor you with a promise of having the position ready for you at the agreed wage upon your green card approval). Therefore, you would likely need to start over and find another company to agree to sponsor you from the beginning of the PERM process.
As you only have 30 days left in your 60 day grace period, you will need to either find a way to maintain your nonimmigrant status or leave the United States. To maintain your nonimmigrant status, you may try to find a company to hire you on your 6th year of H-1B, although this may pose a challenge to both you and the company since you would be capped at working for until November, and then you will need to find ways to maintain valid working status or stop working and go back to school, or leave the US. If you leave the US for a year, your 6 year H-1B allowance would reset, but you would need to win the cap lottery again or find a cap exempt employer to be eligible to work in the US. If you are lucky enough to find employment overseas with a multinational company with a branch or affiliate in the US, and you work in a year in an executive, managerial, or specialized knowledge capacity, then the company can transfer you to the US to work in its related company under L-1 status for 5 or 7 years.
Other ways of maintaining your nonimmigrant status include going back to school and changing your status to F-1 for the duration of your education, or changing your status to a “B” visitor, during which you may interview for future jobs. Best of luck to you.

2. Although the new job salary is $20,000 less than before, those I-485 applicants with higher salaries will not be affected 

A reader asks:
I have submitted my I-485 and recently received an offer base that is $20,000 yuan less than the base of the old company. I would like to ask, if I accept the offer and submit I-485J through the new company, and the salary is $20,000 less than the old company, will it affect the approval of I-485?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
You would be relying upon a transfer of your case under I-485 J, which allows the labor certification and I-140 petition to remain valid if the I-140 petition is approved and the I-485 application pending 180 days, and the new job is in the same or similar occupation. Many factors are taken into account including job duties, SOC codes, job title, of which a $20,000 decrease is a factor to be looked at. It should be noted that $20,000 less when an individual is making a salary of $150,000 is less concerning than when the individual is making $50,000 or so under the labor certification.

3. Although your consulate office is listed in China, you may be able to have H-1B interview in Europe 

A reader asks:
Currently, I am in a small European country and plan to enter the United States to work in the near future. When the first H-1B visa address was chosen in China, there was a high probability that it would be checked. Considering that the current work is very tight and the check-in time is long, can the interview address be changed from China to the country where I currently am in Europe? Also can I get my passport back during the domestic visa interview?

Arthur Lee Esq. answers:
Even though you listed your consulate office as one in China when you filed your I-129 H-1B petition, you may be able to conduct your nonimmigrant visa interview in the European country that you are currently in. You may wish to check the consular post website to see whether it has guidance on its attitude toward third country nationals. If it accepts such cases or you are a resident in the European country, you can file a DS-160 with the European country after your H-1B petition is approved, and schedule an interview there. You may need to provide reasons why you are doing an H-1B interview in a third country rather than your home country–it is likely that a consular officer will be satisfied with your answer that you are currently living in that country and that it is much more convenient than going to China to conduct the interview. On your passport, a consular officer in this European country or China will take your passport to process the visa. The consulate may hold on to your passport for administrative processing if needed, but once a visa approval or denial is issued, you will have your passport returned.

Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on September 1, 2024:1. If I-485 has been waiting for more than 180 days, you can submit I-485J to change companies. 2. I-140 application will not affect the issuance of H-1B by the consulate. 3. There is nothing that says that an individual cannot hold two full-time H-1B positions at the same time

1. I-485 has been waiting for more than 180 days, you can submit I-485J to change companies.

A reader asks:
I am an H-1B programmer and have applied for EB-2, but the priority is not current yet. H-1B sixth year. I submitted I-485 using Form B in early October last year and had my fingerprints taken in December, but unfortunately, I was laid off. Recently, the original company was transferred, and I got an offer from another new company. The work intensity of the two cultures is almost the same. The new company offers a lot of money, which is a level higher. My understanding is that the original company can 100% protect the green card, but the new company offers a lot of money and the job content is also interesting. If the I-485 is less than 180 days, what is the probability of being RFE’d if I go to the new company to get the I-485? If I-485 is rejected and unfortunately, I am laid off again, can I still COS B-2 pending to buy time and find a job?

Arthur Lee, Esq. answers,
In this answer, I assume that you have an EB-2 I-140 already approved or that your EB-2 I-140 will ultimately be approved, and that your former employer did not rescind your I-140. As long as your I-485 has been pending for 180 days or more, you may put in an I-485J porting request. For the porting request to be successful, you must be in a job that is in a “same or similar” occupation as the position on your I-140. Since your priority date is not current, it is unlikely that you will receive any RFE since USCIS will not adjudicate your case until you have a date available. Anyhow, if you receive a request for further evidence, that is not a bad thing–this is an opportunity for you to file an I-485J porting request. Since you properly filed your I-485 in October and this question is now being presented in April, I believe that close to 180 days have elapsed from the filing of your I-485 application. In such a case, if you receive an RFE (which typically allows you 87 days to post a response), you can file an I-485J porting request in response to your RFE. As long as you file the I-485J response at least 180 days after you file your I-485 application, your porting application can be accepted. Therefore, if your RFE is issued at least 90 days after your I-485 submission, you are likely eligible for porting assuming your new position meets the eligibility requirements–just make sure that you don’t submit your RFE response with the I-485J until 180 days have elapsed from the filing receipt date of your I-485.
In order to protect your working status in case of an I-485 denial, you may consider extending your H-1B beyond a 6th year through an H-1B transfer/extension to your new employer. You may be eligible for the H-1B beyond the 6th year if your I-140 or PERM Labor Certification Application (ETA 9089) was filed more than 365 days ago or the I-140 is approved and the priority date is still not available. In this way, you will have extra time on your H-1B and can continue to file extensions until your green card application is approved or denied. If your adjustment of status is denied, you will still have the time remaining on your H-1B to continue working for your designated employer. During that time, and assuming that the denial reason does not impede the following, you may try again with the porting employer or try to find another employer willing to sponsor you for permanent residence.
If you do not take the H-1B extension route, you may still attempt to change status to B-2 to try to find a new job as interviewing for jobs is permitted under this status.

2. I-140 application will not affect the issuance of H-1B by the consulate.

A reader asks:
I haven’t been back to China for a long time. Currently, I have the I-140 approval letter and can only go back and apply for the H-1B visa before coming back. I-140 approval has not arrived yet. Is it difficult to return to China to apply for an H-1B visa? I wonder how long it will take to apply for H-1B now?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
At this time, there appears to be more scrutiny of Chinese students, especially those in the STEM programs at the postgraduate level, by CBP at certain airports in the US. That being said, the H-1B visa is dual intent, meaning that you can have both immigrant and nonimmigrant intent at the same time. So the fact of the I-140 filing should not affect any decision concerning H-1B visa issuance at the consulate. Current consular wait times in China to get an appointment at the American consulate are 56 days in Shanghai if there is an interview and one day if no interview required. Also seven days in Beijing if an interview is required and one day if not. Please note that this does not take into account any further time after the interview if your case is placed under administrative processing.

3. There is nothing that says that an individual cannot hold two full-time H-1B positions at the same time

A reader asks:
I was recently laid off by my company, but I am still on the payroll, and the Termination Date is just after 180 days of my I-485 pending. Now, I have received an offer from a new company, and they want me to start work as soon as possible, preferably next month. However, I have two questions now: 1. Is it illegal if I start work before the Termination Date? Can an H-1B holder work two full-time jobs at the same time? If I start work before 180 days of my I-485 pending, can I pretend nothing happened and then submit my 485J after 180 days? 2. If neither is feasible, what should I do? Of course, I understand that it would be safer if I could postpone it to after the Termination Date, but the new company only gave a verbal offer. I am very worried that if I start work too late, they will not give me an offer.

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
I am sorry to hear that you have been recently laid off by your company, but it is favorable that your termination date is so long after the filing of your I-485. On the question of illegal employment if you join the company now, there is nothing that says that an individual cannot hold two full-time H-1B positions at the same time although it may be difficult to see how this can be done in terms of the number of hours in every day. Joining another company without a proper work authorization is not legal even if you have filed the I-485 application. If you have an EAD card through the filing of form I-765 with your I-485, you may be able to legally join the new employer. After the 180 days has passed, you and the new employer can file the I-485J supplement so long as the new position is in the same or similar occupation.

Article: THE SECOND PRESIDENCY OF DONALD TRUMP – WHAT COMES NEXT?

As published in the Immigration Daily on August 13, 2024

What is a second Donald Trump presidency shaping up to look like? Will Trump stop and smell the roses, happy that he is back in the White House and ease back into the routine of the Oval Office? One would hope for a mellower and happier Trump – that will unfortunately not be happening. He already has a playbook for action in the first 180 days in office to bring the nation back to the end of first Trump presidency. Although Mr. Trump denies knowing anything about the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 900 odd page document, “Mandate for Leadership”, https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf,  those who worked on the document include a number of former Trump officials and aides. A pattern with former president Trump is his transactional character, saying whatever he believes in the moment will help him including currently backing off on the abortion issue, making comments favoring electric vehicles now that Elon Musk is supporting his campaign financially (the Wall Street Journal reported the contribution size as $45 million per month, which Mr. Must later denied) when Trump previously said that Joe Biden’s encouraging the transition to electric vehicles would result in an economic “bloodbath” in the US economy, and now promising not to cut a penny from Social Security or Medicare after saying in March 2024 that there was a lot that could be done with entitlements in terms of cutting. So it is a long stretch to believe that he knows nothing of the report. On credibility, the Washington Post counted 30,573 false or misleading statements during Mr. Trump’s first tour of the White House.

On immigration, the main topic of this article, Mr. Trump and his advisors have promised a massive deportation effort aiming to remove as many as 20 million people from the US through forced expulsions and deportation camps. He has said that under his leadership, they would use all necessary state, local, federal, and military resources to carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history, including deputizing local police officers, and not ruling out the possibility of building new detention camps for processing deportations.

The enmity of Mr. Trump to immigrants has been astounding, saying that they poison the blood of the nation or that they come from shithole African countries or characterizing Mexican border crossers as rapists and criminals.

Specific proposals of the Heritage Foundation document include:

  • Ending the ability of US citizens to bring most classes of family over that they are able to presently sponsor.
  • Ending the Diversity Visa program under which persons without sponsors or US family members are able to have a shot at permanent residence through a lottery program, bringing diverse people from many countries into the US.
  • Revamping the H-1B program to bring in only the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring the US workers are not being disadvantaged by the program.
  • Capping and phasing out the H-2A Visa program for agricultural seasonal workers although also presenting an opposition argument.
  • Consider phasing out the H-2B visa program for nonagricultural seasonal workers, and ensuring that the DHS Secretary will not use his or her discretion to increase the number of such visas above the statutorily set limits although also presenting an opposition argument.
  • Move USCIS to strive to increase opportunities for premium processing to expedite processing times since it provides an opportunity for a significant influx of money into the agency which is not currently available.
  • Bring back every rule related to immigration that was issued during the Trump administration and canceled during the Biden administration.
  • Examine and consider withdrawing or overturning every immigration decision rendered by the Attorney General during the Biden administration.
  • Target lawyers that the government labels as advancing completely meritless arguments before the immigration courts.
  • Instruct the State Department to allow national security concerns to dominate over diplomatic concerns in issuing visas under the Diversity Visa program, F student visa program, and J exchange visitor visa program – and to eliminate or significantly reduce the number of visas issued to foreign students from “enemy nations”.
  • Refocus Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) back on immigration offenses.
  • End ICE’s use of termination and administrative closure of cases in the immigration courts.
  • Instruct USCIS that the focus is not on giving benefits, but to return focus on vetting, examining the base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection.
  • Take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for employment authorization.
  • Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the DHS Secretary for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons – with the prohibition on the use of parole in any categorical circumstance.
  • Restrict prosecutorial discretion.
  • Withdraw and reissue a new regulation on criteria to determine which applicants for immigration are considered to pass the public charge requirement.
  • Repeal TPS (Temporary Protected Status) designations for persons from countries in distress.
  • Move Congress to permanently authorize E-Verify and make it mandatory although it is far from a perfect program.

These are some of the main changes in the field of immigration to be pursued in a second Trump presidency. The rapidity of the changes promises to be breathtaking. A new Trump administration would try to overwhelm opposition by the sheer number of immediate actions in the field. Of note is that the document would supercharge the power of the presidency in immigration and other fields by calling for the replacement of much of the federal work force with political appointees, who could be hired and fired at will.

Aside from the venom, immigrants – even undocumented immigrants – are beneficial to the country economically, culturally, and civilly. A number of studies over the years including one just conducted by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office in July 2024, “Effects of the Immigration Surge on The Federal Budget and the Economy”, concluded that a surge of immigrants already here and expected to come between 2021-2026 would lower the federal deficit by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade; that as most of the population would be of working age, they would draw less in terms of federal, state and local benefits although the CBO report did not take into account state and local costs; that they would pay $788 billion in taxes and generate $387 billion of extra federal revenue through their effects on the overall economy. This follows a number of articles over the years extolling the beneficial effects of increased immigration on the country’s economy. Culturally, immigrants have always enriched the melting pot of America in bringing their diverse languages, ways of living, food, religions, and points of view. And despite Mr. Trump’s eagerness to highlight every instance of immigrant crime, crime statistics show that immigrants commit crimes in far less numbers and percentages those of the general American populace. A study published by researchers from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2020, Undocumented immigrants far less likely to commit crimes in U.S. than citizens (wisc.edu) found that, compared to undocumented immigrants, U.S. citizens were:

Another study, titled “Comparing Crime Rates Between Undocumented Immigrants, Legal Immigrants, and U.S. Citizens”, also highlighted that U.S.-born citizens are more likely to be arrested for violent crimes, drug crimes, and property crimes relative to undocumented immigrants.

The US requires a President who is able to look at facts and not distort them for his or her personal ambition and political aims. A steady hand promoting the interests of the country is a necessity over a President frustrated in the fine details of governing and making wild stabs of decision-making based upon whatever is in his or her mind at the present moment. Considered decision-making based upon what is best for the country and not promoting a political agenda right or left is the mark of what will be a great President. From promised mass deportation efforts to the Heritage Foundation’s planned 180 days sprint to enact restrictive rules in immigration that have no benefit to the country, there is good cause to doubt that a second term for Donald Trump will lift the country.

Article: HANDLING OF §212 (D) (3) WAIVERS FOR DACA HOLDERS AND OTHER UNDOCUMENTED COLLEGE GRADUATES BY CONSULAR POSTS.

As published in the Immigration Daily on July y 24, 2024

Relating to the Executive Order of June 17, 2024, affecting DACA holders and other undocumented university and college graduates and the June 18, 2024, fact sheet put out by the White House, FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces New Actions to Keep Families Together | The White House that the announcement would allow individuals, including DACA recipients and other Dreamers, who have earned a degree at an accredited US institution of higher education in the United States, and who have received an offer of employment from a US employer in the field related to their degree, to more quickly receive work visas, the latest update to the Department of State’s “Easing the Nonimmigrant Visa Process for U.S. College Graduates (state.gov)” on July 15, 2024, sees the Department still seemingly directing its energies in awaiting only H-1B visa applications as, in answer to the question “How long are current interview appointment wait times for employment based nonimmigrant visas and overseas posts?”,  it said that interview wait times for H-1B visas are minimal at most of its overseas posts.

It further stated that updated waiver guidance for consular officers was issued on July 15, 2024. §212 (d) (3) waivers of inadmissibility are necessary in most cases for these classes of applicants to obtain visas at the consulates due to the 3 or 10 year bars attendant to remaining unlawfully in the US for six months or one year respectively after the age of 18. Although not going into detail on waiver procedure in the update itself, a look at the Foreign Affairs Manual changes (new parts in bold) https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM030504.html shows the new guidance for consular officers:

9 FAM 305.4-3(C)  (U) Factors to Consider When Recommending a Waiver

(CT:VISA-2025;   07-15-2024)

a. (U) You may, in your discretion, recommend an INA 212(d)(3)(A) waiver for any nonimmigrant whose case meets the criteria of 9 FAM 305.4-3(B) above and whose presence would not be harmful to U.S. interests. Eligibility for a waiver is not conditioned on having a qualifying family relationship, or the passage of a specific amount of time, or any other special statutory threshold requirement.  The law does not require that such action be limited to humanitarian or other exceptional cases.  While the exercise of discretion and good judgment is essential, you may recommend waivers for any legitimate purpose of travel.

b. Unavailable

c. (U) You should consider the following factors, among others, when deciding whether to recommend a waiver:

    (1)  (U) The recency and seriousness of the activity or condition causing the applicant’s ineligibility;

    (2)  (U) The reasons for the proposed travel to the United States; and

    (3)  (U) The positive or negative effect, if any, of the planned travel on U.S. public interests.  NOTE: In general, you should consider cases where the applicant has graduated with a degree from an institution of higher education in the United States, or has earned credentials to engage in skilled labor in the United States, and is seeking to travel to the United States to commence or continue employment with a U.S. employer in a field related to the education that the applicant attained in the United States, to have a positive effect on U.S. public interests;

9 FAM 305.4-3(E)(2)  (U) When to Submit Applications to the Department for Review

(CT:VISA-2025;   07-15-2024)

a. (U) If an applicant or interested party requests a waiver after you decline to recommend one, you should refer the request to the Department for review if the case meets one of the criteria below.  Supervisor concurrence is required if you find that the applicant’s waiver request does not meet one of the listed criteria:

    (1)  (U) Foreign Relations:  Refusal of the NIV application would become a bilateral irritant or be raised by a foreign government with a high-ranking U.S. government official;

    (2) (U) National Security:  Admission to the United States would advance a U.S. national security interest;

    (3) (U) Law Enforcement:  Admission to the United States would advance an important U.S. law enforcement objective;

    (4) (U) Significant Public Interest:  Admission to the United States would advance a significant U.S. public interest including the positive effect of the planned travel on U.S. public interests described above in 9 FAM 305.4-3(C)(c)(3)

9 FAM 305.4-3(F)  (U) Waiver Expedite Requests

(U) As described in 9 FAM 305.4-3(C)(c)(3) with regard to recommending a waiver, there is a clear and significant U.S. public interest in asking CBP/ARO to expedite a waiver request if the applicant has graduated with a degree from an institution of higher education in the United States, or has earned credentials to engage in skilled labor in the United States, and is seeking to travel to the United States to commence or continue employment with a U.S. employer in a field that requires the education that the applicant attained in the United States. 

 The groundwork now appears laid for consular interviews although with no guarantee that the applicant will receive the visa. Inadmissibility grounds or doubts concerning the underlying petition may still derail the visa quest.

The Department of State appears prepared to entertain and expeditiously work with DHS on H-1B visa applications and inadmissibility waivers from DACA holders and other undocumented college or university graduates, but the Department update and FAM changes do not speak to any contemplated new program or other visa categories, a concern expressed in our last article, Article: Before Federal Register Notice Appears, Questions Relating to the Executive Order of June 17, 2024, Affecting DACA Holders and Other Undocumented University and College Graduates by Alan Lee, Esq – ILW.COM Discussion Board. The emphasis on H-1B visa applications may very well be centered on the dual intent character of the visa in that applicants do not have to prove nonimmigrant intent or a residence in their home countries during visa interviews. Because of the numbers limitation on cap H-1B visas (only 85,000 approximately per year) and the current severe competition making selection a form of “lottery,” many are eagerly awaiting the anticipated Federal Register notice to see whether the Executive Order’s scope will cover more than the H-1B program.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on July 14, 2024:1. Your EB-2 is nontransferable to a petition by your wife 2. Porting your Employment 3. For overseas immigrant case receipt, you can attempt to ask for assistance by emailing 4. You should stay with the employer for a period of time after obtaining permanent residence 

1. Your EB-2 is nontransferable to a petition by your wife

A reader asks:
I am the most common PERM EB-2, and I am waiting for the priority date to become current. My spouse is currently studying for a Ph.D. and hopes to apply for EB-1 in the future. However, since EB-1 also must wait for priority date now, we are considering whether to file NIW to get the priority date first, as the NIW priority date can also be used for EB-1 later so the EB-1won’t have to wait too long. I want to confirm that if my EB-2 has been current, it will be of no use to my spouse? My spouse still must take advantage of her own NIW? Does our situation mean that our applications are completely independent from each other? If one of us is fast, we can get married before submitting the I-485 together. Whether there is no need to get married in advance in order to prepare the I-485 a few years later?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
The rule of thumb is that follow to join privileges or being able to join cases ends at the time that the principal applicant is approved for permanent residence. That being said, USCIS and/or American consulate posts are prone to be more suspicious of cases in which the marriage comes about when the permanent residence benefit is close. As to your specific thoughts, you are correct that your EB-2 is nontransferable to a petition by your wife.  Your wife filing and having an approved NIW petition would give her a priority date that could be transferred to a later EB-1 petition.  If you are doing one case and your intended spouse is doing another, those cases are independent of each other and the dependent can join at the I-485 or consular processing stage. If you choose to marry late, please be aware that the circumstances of your marrying may be looked at harder than if you married earlier.

2. Porting your Employment

A reader asks:
I am in the central part of the country and have encountered layoffs. My current situation is that H-1B expires on July 30. RD is 173 days as of July 30th. It’s a bit hopeless to find a job in the next few days to renew the H-1B. I-485 has been submitted, but it has not been completed for 180 days. Some people say that as long as I am not scheduled for a green card interview during this period, I shall be safe. Is that so? Can I transfer into an F-1 and wait for green card? Or do I need to change jobs? or hope that my green card will be approved on July 30? Asked Emma, ​​said my case was in NBC for more information. PD is September 2019 and it is already current. If I find a job, do I need to submit H-1B and I-485J at the same time?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Generally, an employer sponsoring an applicant for I-140 and I-485 should have the intent to offer permanent employment at the time that the employer signs off on the I-140 and the I-485 J “Supplement J, Confirmation of Bona Fide Job Offer or Request for Job Portability under INA section 24 (J)”. If your I-485 pends for 180 days and you have a new employer in the same or similar occupation willing to continue your sponsorship and signs off on a new Supplement J, you can submit it to USCIS to attempt to port your employment to the new employer. In the meantime, you may consider applying for an EAD on form I-765 Application for Employment Authorization so that you can be available for employment with an employer other than your current one. Also you gave a certain date that your H-1B expires. Have you taken the 60 day grace period to find new employment into account? If you have a new employer willing to do so, it can also alternatively petition for a new H-1B on your behalf, preferably within the 60 day grace period.

3. For overseas immigrant case receipt, you can attempt to ask for assistance by emailing

A reader asks:
I recently applied for NIW. Because I applied from overseas, my $700 payment had been deducted, but I have not received a receipt number yet. I asked Emma today and she didn’t find my application information, and it has been more than a week since the fee was deducted. How long does it take to get the receipt number from Emma?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
The good news is that your case has been accepted by USCIS since you somehow know that the $700 filing fee has been deducted. Receipts from USCIS for persons filing from overseas can cause headaches. We have seen receipts for overseas clients being returned to USCIS for non-delivery. A mailing address in the US may help as is having a legal representative in the US since USCIS would send a copy of any notices including receipts to the legal representative. Emma is not a tool focused on giving receipt information back to individuals. Receipts from USCIS to US addresses are generally received between 2-3 weeks from the time of sending out the petition or application to USCIS unless the case is filed online or through premium processing, in which case receipts come much sooner. You may attempt to ask for assistance by emailing lockboxsupport@uscis.dhs.gov. Hope that you receive your receipt soon!

4. You should stay with the employer for a period of time after obtaining permanent residence 

A reader asks:
I applied for EB-3 and wanted to get a green card. The reason why I wanted to get a green card was that I studied at the university in the United States and worked in the United States for five years after graduation. For nearly ten years, I felt that there were many ways out after getting a green card. I returned to China last year, and before that my green card was already current. Now I have the opportunity to transfer back to my old employer in the United States. I can submit I-485 and get a green card in one year. However, I plan to live in China long tern in the future, and I feel that the cost of returning to China after getting the green card is a bit high. In addition, I am a female, 29 years old this year. During the year after I returned to China, I didn’t find a partner in China. If I return to the United States for a year and delay another year, I will be 30 years old when I return to China. It will feel more difficult to find a partner or work in the workplace.

If the original boss supports the transfer back to the United States, he can apply for the L-1 visa and continue to use the previous I-140. If I am not with the current company, there will be no need for L-1 but H-1B, and no need to use the original I-140. I have about one year and five months left on my H-1B. I will need one year and 5 months to complete my PERM & I-140, then submit I-485.  Is there enough time?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
I will assume that your calculation of about one year and five months left on your H-1B is accurate. If so, your timing plan is probably not viable in completing the PERM process through another employer. Currently it is taking approximately two years taking into account only the time required to obtain an ETA 9141 prevailing wage determination and the processing time of the ETA 9089 PERM application (19 months) which does not account for the further time required to set up the case and conduct recruitment along with preparing the I-140 petition. Your option to obtain permanent residence through a transfer back to your old employer and continuing the green card application appears more viable. Under either situation, you will have to stay with the employer for a period of time after obtaining permanent residence as US law requires an applicant through labor certification to show a commitment to work with the sponsoring employer. So you will have to think about timing and commitment in making your choice whether to come back to the US to pursue permanent residence or staying in China, your professed preferred long-term residence and marital location.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on July 7, 2024:Overseas immigration visa? Adjustment of status? Which is better?

Overseas immigration visa? Adjustment of status? Which is better?

A reader asks:
When I submitted my I-140, I chose IV at the suggestion of my lawyer, which means I will have an interview in Guangzhou. But I have actually been in the United States and I don’t plan to return to China in the future. So, can I change it to submitting I-485 in China? If so, when should I submit it? The problem now is that I recently had an I140 with a very late PD (PD is not C) passed, but I found that when I checked the case status, it showed that the case was sent to the State Department. I am confused, does this mean that I will have to go back to China and go to Guangzhou to apply for an immigrant visa in the future?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers:
The initial question should be why your lawyer advised you to choose immigrant visa processing rather than adjustment of status. If the lawyer’s advice is sound, then it may be detrimental to you to try adjustment of status. You should probably have another discussion with your attorney before making a decision to switch to adjustment of status. Procedurally, it does not matter much that the I-140 petition is now with the State Department. If it makes sense for you to adjust status, you can file form I-485, and USCIS will generally recall the approved petition from the National Visa Center. You or your lawyer can also attach a statement on the I-485 application that your approved I-140 petition is now with the National Visa Center and asking it to request NVC to return the petition.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on June 30, 2024 1. I-485 has been submitted before being layoff, can apply for form I-765 2.  Withdrawal I-485 by mistake, attorney should rectify the situation as quickly as possible 3. Consular officers do keep historical records 4. It is not unusual that a principal applicant’s case will be adjudicated prior to that of the dependent

1. I-485 has been submitted before being layoff, can apply for form I-765 

A reader asks:
I am in the central part of the country and have encountered layoffs. My current situation is that H-1B expires on July 30. RD is 173 days as of July 30th. It’s a bit hopeless to find a job in the next few days to renew the H-1B. I-485 has been submitted, but it has not been completed for 180 days. Some people say that as long as I am not scheduled for a green card interview during this period, I shall be safe. Is that so? Can I transfer into an F-1 and wait for green card? Or do I need to change jobs? or hope that my green card will be approved on July 30? Asked Emma, ​​said my case was in NBC for more information. PD is September 2019 and it is already current. If I find a job, do I need to submit H-1B and I-485J at the same time?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Generally, an employer sponsoring an applicant for I-140 and I-485 should have the intent to offer permanent employment at the time that the employer signs off on the I-140 and the I-485 J “Supplement J, Confirmation of Bona Fide Job Offer or Request for Job Portability under INA section 24 (J)”. If your I-485 pends for 180 days and you have a new employer in the same or similar occupation willing to continue your sponsorship and signs off on a new Supplement J, you can submit it to USCIS to attempt to port your employment to the new employer. In the meantime, you may consider applying for an EAD on form I-765 Application for Employment Authorization so that you can be available for employment with an employer other than your current one. Also you gave a certain date that your H-1B expires. Have you taken the 60-day grace period to find new employment into account? If you have a new employer willing to do so, it can also alternatively petition for a new H-1B on your behalf, preferably within the 60-day grace period.

2.  Withdrawal I-485 by mistake, attorney should rectify the situation as quickly as possible 

A reader asks:
I am currently preparing I-485 materials. Before my current company’s H-1B, a more complicated situation occurred. I would like to ask how to prepare the materials? The company made a personnel adjustment around April 2023, and I was not affected. However, the HR oolong put my name on the layoff list and sent it to the company’s lawyer to cancel the H-1B. The withdrawal application was submitted at that time. Later in September, I contacted the company’s lawyer. She realized that there was a problem before, so she quickly issued another H-1B application, added premium processing, and approved it quickly. The lawyer said that she was also applying to cancel the previous withdrawal application at the same time, so I now have two H-1B approval notices from the same company. According to the lawyer, the H-1B withdrawal application did not take effect, so there is no problem. Do I need to ask a lawyer for any documents to prove this? The I-485 documents only include the two H-1B approval notices. Do I need to submit documents for the application to revoke the H-1B and the subsequent revocation of the H-1B?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
It appears that your company’s attorney attempted to rectify your situation as quickly as possible after you made her aware of the mistake. It is commendable that she was also attempting to cancel the previous cancellation notice to USCIS at the same time. On the I-485 application, it might be helpful to have the lawyer explain the entire sequence of events so that USCIS has a complete understanding of your situation prior to making an adjudication on your I-485 application. If possible, the lawyer can also use the opportunity to explain if and how you might still be eligible for I-485 adjustment even in the event that USCIS does revoke the first H-1B petition in April 2023.

3. Consular officers do keep historical records

A reader asks:
My status expired in 2018, so I had to apply for a dependent status. Later, I did not have a visa until my OPT expired. After moving to Canada, I was asked about the L visa, but I did not expect it and was not prepared, which led to the rejection of my visa in 2021. Now, more than a year has passed, and GK5 has passed. I want to try to go back with an L visa. However, because the L visa is valid for 5 years, the L visa I-797 used is still the same. I heard that in the United States, visa interviewers will not dig up such historical records after 5 years. Is this true? The last time my visa was rejected in 2021, I was asked about the rejection on the new DS160. Do I need to fill in the reason for the rejection directly? Is the specific explanation 212A6C? Or can it be said that I was not well prepared before?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Consular officers do keep historical records, and it is likely that your prior refusal will be on the database. You have said that the reason for rejection in the past was 212 A6C. That ground is inadmissibility for fraud or misrepresentation in attempting to enter the US. On the DS-160 nonimmigrant application form, there are two questions relevant to your situation – the first is, “Have you ever been refused a US visa, been refused admission to the United States, or withdrawn your application for admission at the point of entry? If yes, explain. When? Where? What type of visa?” and “Have you ever sought to obtain or assist others to obtain a visa, entry into the United States, or any other United States immigration benefit by fraud or willful misrepresentation or other unlawful means?”  To the first question, you would have to answer in the affirmative and answer the questions and state the circumstances that you believe are in your favor. If you believe that your explanation is thoroughly sufficient to explain that you did not commit fraud or misrepresentation, you may decide to answer “no” to the second question. The consular officer, however, should have a full understanding of the circumstances surrounding the prior denial when he or she finishes reading the DS-160 application.

4. It is not unusual that a principal applicant’s case will be adjudicated prior to that of the dependent

A reader asks:
I applied for EB-1B, and the waiting period has come. I just got my green card. My spouse and I submitted I-485, but it is still CRP. I would like to ask, is the subsequent review of the spouse’s status completely independent or will it have a certain impact?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
A dependent spouse’s I-485 application is generally dependent upon the eligibility of the principal applicant, you. You have already received your green card, so that means that your principal case has been deemed approvable. The dependent will usually be approved if USCIS believes that the relationship is bona fide and that the dependent is not inadmissible to the US. Where marriages are concerned, USCIS may look into the marital relationship, especially if the couple married close to the time of submitting the I-485 applications. USCIS may also be conducting background clearances, and these are sometimes delayed. The agency wants to ascertain that applicants are not terrorists, have no criminal records or non-excludable criminal records, etc., before granting permanent residence. Dependents may also have had their own immigration file records in the past that USCIS will have to review before making a decision. It is not unusual that a principal applicant’s case will be adjudicated prior to that of the dependent.