Article: HANDLING OF §212 (D) (3) WAIVERS FOR DACA HOLDERS AND OTHER UNDOCUMENTED COLLEGE GRADUATES BY CONSULAR POSTS.

As published in the Immigration Daily on July y 24, 2024

Relating to the Executive Order of June 17, 2024, affecting DACA holders and other undocumented university and college graduates and the June 18, 2024, fact sheet put out by the White House, FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces New Actions to Keep Families Together | The White House that the announcement would allow individuals, including DACA recipients and other Dreamers, who have earned a degree at an accredited US institution of higher education in the United States, and who have received an offer of employment from a US employer in the field related to their degree, to more quickly receive work visas, the latest update to the Department of State’s “Easing the Nonimmigrant Visa Process for U.S. College Graduates (state.gov)” on July 15, 2024, sees the Department still seemingly directing its energies in awaiting only H-1B visa applications as, in answer to the question “How long are current interview appointment wait times for employment based nonimmigrant visas and overseas posts?”,  it said that interview wait times for H-1B visas are minimal at most of its overseas posts.

It further stated that updated waiver guidance for consular officers was issued on July 15, 2024. §212 (d) (3) waivers of inadmissibility are necessary in most cases for these classes of applicants to obtain visas at the consulates due to the 3 or 10 year bars attendant to remaining unlawfully in the US for six months or one year respectively after the age of 18. Although not going into detail on waiver procedure in the update itself, a look at the Foreign Affairs Manual changes (new parts in bold) https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM030504.html shows the new guidance for consular officers:

9 FAM 305.4-3(C)  (U) Factors to Consider When Recommending a Waiver

(CT:VISA-2025;   07-15-2024)

a. (U) You may, in your discretion, recommend an INA 212(d)(3)(A) waiver for any nonimmigrant whose case meets the criteria of 9 FAM 305.4-3(B) above and whose presence would not be harmful to U.S. interests. Eligibility for a waiver is not conditioned on having a qualifying family relationship, or the passage of a specific amount of time, or any other special statutory threshold requirement.  The law does not require that such action be limited to humanitarian or other exceptional cases.  While the exercise of discretion and good judgment is essential, you may recommend waivers for any legitimate purpose of travel.

b. Unavailable

c. (U) You should consider the following factors, among others, when deciding whether to recommend a waiver:

    (1)  (U) The recency and seriousness of the activity or condition causing the applicant’s ineligibility;

    (2)  (U) The reasons for the proposed travel to the United States; and

    (3)  (U) The positive or negative effect, if any, of the planned travel on U.S. public interests.  NOTE: In general, you should consider cases where the applicant has graduated with a degree from an institution of higher education in the United States, or has earned credentials to engage in skilled labor in the United States, and is seeking to travel to the United States to commence or continue employment with a U.S. employer in a field related to the education that the applicant attained in the United States, to have a positive effect on U.S. public interests;

9 FAM 305.4-3(E)(2)  (U) When to Submit Applications to the Department for Review

(CT:VISA-2025;   07-15-2024)

a. (U) If an applicant or interested party requests a waiver after you decline to recommend one, you should refer the request to the Department for review if the case meets one of the criteria below.  Supervisor concurrence is required if you find that the applicant’s waiver request does not meet one of the listed criteria:

    (1)  (U) Foreign Relations:  Refusal of the NIV application would become a bilateral irritant or be raised by a foreign government with a high-ranking U.S. government official;

    (2) (U) National Security:  Admission to the United States would advance a U.S. national security interest;

    (3) (U) Law Enforcement:  Admission to the United States would advance an important U.S. law enforcement objective;

    (4) (U) Significant Public Interest:  Admission to the United States would advance a significant U.S. public interest including the positive effect of the planned travel on U.S. public interests described above in 9 FAM 305.4-3(C)(c)(3)

9 FAM 305.4-3(F)  (U) Waiver Expedite Requests

(U) As described in 9 FAM 305.4-3(C)(c)(3) with regard to recommending a waiver, there is a clear and significant U.S. public interest in asking CBP/ARO to expedite a waiver request if the applicant has graduated with a degree from an institution of higher education in the United States, or has earned credentials to engage in skilled labor in the United States, and is seeking to travel to the United States to commence or continue employment with a U.S. employer in a field that requires the education that the applicant attained in the United States. 

 The groundwork now appears laid for consular interviews although with no guarantee that the applicant will receive the visa. Inadmissibility grounds or doubts concerning the underlying petition may still derail the visa quest.

The Department of State appears prepared to entertain and expeditiously work with DHS on H-1B visa applications and inadmissibility waivers from DACA holders and other undocumented college or university graduates, but the Department update and FAM changes do not speak to any contemplated new program or other visa categories, a concern expressed in our last article, Article: Before Federal Register Notice Appears, Questions Relating to the Executive Order of June 17, 2024, Affecting DACA Holders and Other Undocumented University and College Graduates by Alan Lee, Esq – ILW.COM Discussion Board. The emphasis on H-1B visa applications may very well be centered on the dual intent character of the visa in that applicants do not have to prove nonimmigrant intent or a residence in their home countries during visa interviews. Because of the numbers limitation on cap H-1B visas (only 85,000 approximately per year) and the current severe competition making selection a form of “lottery,” many are eagerly awaiting the anticipated Federal Register notice to see whether the Executive Order’s scope will cover more than the H-1B program.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on July 14, 2024:1. Your EB-2 is nontransferable to a petition by your wife 2. Porting your Employment 3. For overseas immigrant case receipt, you can attempt to ask for assistance by emailing 4. You should stay with the employer for a period of time after obtaining permanent residence 

1. Your EB-2 is nontransferable to a petition by your wife

A reader asks:
I am the most common PERM EB-2, and I am waiting for the priority date to become current. My spouse is currently studying for a Ph.D. and hopes to apply for EB-1 in the future. However, since EB-1 also must wait for priority date now, we are considering whether to file NIW to get the priority date first, as the NIW priority date can also be used for EB-1 later so the EB-1won’t have to wait too long. I want to confirm that if my EB-2 has been current, it will be of no use to my spouse? My spouse still must take advantage of her own NIW? Does our situation mean that our applications are completely independent from each other? If one of us is fast, we can get married before submitting the I-485 together. Whether there is no need to get married in advance in order to prepare the I-485 a few years later?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
The rule of thumb is that follow to join privileges or being able to join cases ends at the time that the principal applicant is approved for permanent residence. That being said, USCIS and/or American consulate posts are prone to be more suspicious of cases in which the marriage comes about when the permanent residence benefit is close. As to your specific thoughts, you are correct that your EB-2 is nontransferable to a petition by your wife.  Your wife filing and having an approved NIW petition would give her a priority date that could be transferred to a later EB-1 petition.  If you are doing one case and your intended spouse is doing another, those cases are independent of each other and the dependent can join at the I-485 or consular processing stage. If you choose to marry late, please be aware that the circumstances of your marrying may be looked at harder than if you married earlier.

2. Porting your Employment

A reader asks:
I am in the central part of the country and have encountered layoffs. My current situation is that H-1B expires on July 30. RD is 173 days as of July 30th. It’s a bit hopeless to find a job in the next few days to renew the H-1B. I-485 has been submitted, but it has not been completed for 180 days. Some people say that as long as I am not scheduled for a green card interview during this period, I shall be safe. Is that so? Can I transfer into an F-1 and wait for green card? Or do I need to change jobs? or hope that my green card will be approved on July 30? Asked Emma, ​​said my case was in NBC for more information. PD is September 2019 and it is already current. If I find a job, do I need to submit H-1B and I-485J at the same time?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Generally, an employer sponsoring an applicant for I-140 and I-485 should have the intent to offer permanent employment at the time that the employer signs off on the I-140 and the I-485 J “Supplement J, Confirmation of Bona Fide Job Offer or Request for Job Portability under INA section 24 (J)”. If your I-485 pends for 180 days and you have a new employer in the same or similar occupation willing to continue your sponsorship and signs off on a new Supplement J, you can submit it to USCIS to attempt to port your employment to the new employer. In the meantime, you may consider applying for an EAD on form I-765 Application for Employment Authorization so that you can be available for employment with an employer other than your current one. Also you gave a certain date that your H-1B expires. Have you taken the 60 day grace period to find new employment into account? If you have a new employer willing to do so, it can also alternatively petition for a new H-1B on your behalf, preferably within the 60 day grace period.

3. For overseas immigrant case receipt, you can attempt to ask for assistance by emailing

A reader asks:
I recently applied for NIW. Because I applied from overseas, my $700 payment had been deducted, but I have not received a receipt number yet. I asked Emma today and she didn’t find my application information, and it has been more than a week since the fee was deducted. How long does it take to get the receipt number from Emma?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
The good news is that your case has been accepted by USCIS since you somehow know that the $700 filing fee has been deducted. Receipts from USCIS for persons filing from overseas can cause headaches. We have seen receipts for overseas clients being returned to USCIS for non-delivery. A mailing address in the US may help as is having a legal representative in the US since USCIS would send a copy of any notices including receipts to the legal representative. Emma is not a tool focused on giving receipt information back to individuals. Receipts from USCIS to US addresses are generally received between 2-3 weeks from the time of sending out the petition or application to USCIS unless the case is filed online or through premium processing, in which case receipts come much sooner. You may attempt to ask for assistance by emailing lockboxsupport@uscis.dhs.gov. Hope that you receive your receipt soon!

4. You should stay with the employer for a period of time after obtaining permanent residence 

A reader asks:
I applied for EB-3 and wanted to get a green card. The reason why I wanted to get a green card was that I studied at the university in the United States and worked in the United States for five years after graduation. For nearly ten years, I felt that there were many ways out after getting a green card. I returned to China last year, and before that my green card was already current. Now I have the opportunity to transfer back to my old employer in the United States. I can submit I-485 and get a green card in one year. However, I plan to live in China long tern in the future, and I feel that the cost of returning to China after getting the green card is a bit high. In addition, I am a female, 29 years old this year. During the year after I returned to China, I didn’t find a partner in China. If I return to the United States for a year and delay another year, I will be 30 years old when I return to China. It will feel more difficult to find a partner or work in the workplace.

If the original boss supports the transfer back to the United States, he can apply for the L-1 visa and continue to use the previous I-140. If I am not with the current company, there will be no need for L-1 but H-1B, and no need to use the original I-140. I have about one year and five months left on my H-1B. I will need one year and 5 months to complete my PERM & I-140, then submit I-485.  Is there enough time?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
I will assume that your calculation of about one year and five months left on your H-1B is accurate. If so, your timing plan is probably not viable in completing the PERM process through another employer. Currently it is taking approximately two years taking into account only the time required to obtain an ETA 9141 prevailing wage determination and the processing time of the ETA 9089 PERM application (19 months) which does not account for the further time required to set up the case and conduct recruitment along with preparing the I-140 petition. Your option to obtain permanent residence through a transfer back to your old employer and continuing the green card application appears more viable. Under either situation, you will have to stay with the employer for a period of time after obtaining permanent residence as US law requires an applicant through labor certification to show a commitment to work with the sponsoring employer. So you will have to think about timing and commitment in making your choice whether to come back to the US to pursue permanent residence or staying in China, your professed preferred long-term residence and marital location.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on July 7, 2024:Overseas immigration visa? Adjustment of status? Which is better?

Overseas immigration visa? Adjustment of status? Which is better?

A reader asks:
When I submitted my I-140, I chose IV at the suggestion of my lawyer, which means I will have an interview in Guangzhou. But I have actually been in the United States and I don’t plan to return to China in the future. So, can I change it to submitting I-485 in China? If so, when should I submit it? The problem now is that I recently had an I140 with a very late PD (PD is not C) passed, but I found that when I checked the case status, it showed that the case was sent to the State Department. I am confused, does this mean that I will have to go back to China and go to Guangzhou to apply for an immigrant visa in the future?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers:
The initial question should be why your lawyer advised you to choose immigrant visa processing rather than adjustment of status. If the lawyer’s advice is sound, then it may be detrimental to you to try adjustment of status. You should probably have another discussion with your attorney before making a decision to switch to adjustment of status. Procedurally, it does not matter much that the I-140 petition is now with the State Department. If it makes sense for you to adjust status, you can file form I-485, and USCIS will generally recall the approved petition from the National Visa Center. You or your lawyer can also attach a statement on the I-485 application that your approved I-140 petition is now with the National Visa Center and asking it to request NVC to return the petition.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on June 30, 2024 1. I-485 has been submitted before being layoff, can apply for form I-765 2.  Withdrawal I-485 by mistake, attorney should rectify the situation as quickly as possible 3. Consular officers do keep historical records 4. It is not unusual that a principal applicant’s case will be adjudicated prior to that of the dependent

1. I-485 has been submitted before being layoff, can apply for form I-765 

A reader asks:
I am in the central part of the country and have encountered layoffs. My current situation is that H-1B expires on July 30. RD is 173 days as of July 30th. It’s a bit hopeless to find a job in the next few days to renew the H-1B. I-485 has been submitted, but it has not been completed for 180 days. Some people say that as long as I am not scheduled for a green card interview during this period, I shall be safe. Is that so? Can I transfer into an F-1 and wait for green card? Or do I need to change jobs? or hope that my green card will be approved on July 30? Asked Emma, ​​said my case was in NBC for more information. PD is September 2019 and it is already current. If I find a job, do I need to submit H-1B and I-485J at the same time?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Generally, an employer sponsoring an applicant for I-140 and I-485 should have the intent to offer permanent employment at the time that the employer signs off on the I-140 and the I-485 J “Supplement J, Confirmation of Bona Fide Job Offer or Request for Job Portability under INA section 24 (J)”. If your I-485 pends for 180 days and you have a new employer in the same or similar occupation willing to continue your sponsorship and signs off on a new Supplement J, you can submit it to USCIS to attempt to port your employment to the new employer. In the meantime, you may consider applying for an EAD on form I-765 Application for Employment Authorization so that you can be available for employment with an employer other than your current one. Also you gave a certain date that your H-1B expires. Have you taken the 60-day grace period to find new employment into account? If you have a new employer willing to do so, it can also alternatively petition for a new H-1B on your behalf, preferably within the 60-day grace period.

2.  Withdrawal I-485 by mistake, attorney should rectify the situation as quickly as possible 

A reader asks:
I am currently preparing I-485 materials. Before my current company’s H-1B, a more complicated situation occurred. I would like to ask how to prepare the materials? The company made a personnel adjustment around April 2023, and I was not affected. However, the HR oolong put my name on the layoff list and sent it to the company’s lawyer to cancel the H-1B. The withdrawal application was submitted at that time. Later in September, I contacted the company’s lawyer. She realized that there was a problem before, so she quickly issued another H-1B application, added premium processing, and approved it quickly. The lawyer said that she was also applying to cancel the previous withdrawal application at the same time, so I now have two H-1B approval notices from the same company. According to the lawyer, the H-1B withdrawal application did not take effect, so there is no problem. Do I need to ask a lawyer for any documents to prove this? The I-485 documents only include the two H-1B approval notices. Do I need to submit documents for the application to revoke the H-1B and the subsequent revocation of the H-1B?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
It appears that your company’s attorney attempted to rectify your situation as quickly as possible after you made her aware of the mistake. It is commendable that she was also attempting to cancel the previous cancellation notice to USCIS at the same time. On the I-485 application, it might be helpful to have the lawyer explain the entire sequence of events so that USCIS has a complete understanding of your situation prior to making an adjudication on your I-485 application. If possible, the lawyer can also use the opportunity to explain if and how you might still be eligible for I-485 adjustment even in the event that USCIS does revoke the first H-1B petition in April 2023.

3. Consular officers do keep historical records

A reader asks:
My status expired in 2018, so I had to apply for a dependent status. Later, I did not have a visa until my OPT expired. After moving to Canada, I was asked about the L visa, but I did not expect it and was not prepared, which led to the rejection of my visa in 2021. Now, more than a year has passed, and GK5 has passed. I want to try to go back with an L visa. However, because the L visa is valid for 5 years, the L visa I-797 used is still the same. I heard that in the United States, visa interviewers will not dig up such historical records after 5 years. Is this true? The last time my visa was rejected in 2021, I was asked about the rejection on the new DS160. Do I need to fill in the reason for the rejection directly? Is the specific explanation 212A6C? Or can it be said that I was not well prepared before?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Consular officers do keep historical records, and it is likely that your prior refusal will be on the database. You have said that the reason for rejection in the past was 212 A6C. That ground is inadmissibility for fraud or misrepresentation in attempting to enter the US. On the DS-160 nonimmigrant application form, there are two questions relevant to your situation – the first is, “Have you ever been refused a US visa, been refused admission to the United States, or withdrawn your application for admission at the point of entry? If yes, explain. When? Where? What type of visa?” and “Have you ever sought to obtain or assist others to obtain a visa, entry into the United States, or any other United States immigration benefit by fraud or willful misrepresentation or other unlawful means?”  To the first question, you would have to answer in the affirmative and answer the questions and state the circumstances that you believe are in your favor. If you believe that your explanation is thoroughly sufficient to explain that you did not commit fraud or misrepresentation, you may decide to answer “no” to the second question. The consular officer, however, should have a full understanding of the circumstances surrounding the prior denial when he or she finishes reading the DS-160 application.

4. It is not unusual that a principal applicant’s case will be adjudicated prior to that of the dependent

A reader asks:
I applied for EB-1B, and the waiting period has come. I just got my green card. My spouse and I submitted I-485, but it is still CRP. I would like to ask, is the subsequent review of the spouse’s status completely independent or will it have a certain impact?

Mr. Alan Lee Esq. answers,
A dependent spouse’s I-485 application is generally dependent upon the eligibility of the principal applicant, you. You have already received your green card, so that means that your principal case has been deemed approvable. The dependent will usually be approved if USCIS believes that the relationship is bona fide and that the dependent is not inadmissible to the US. Where marriages are concerned, USCIS may look into the marital relationship, especially if the couple married close to the time of submitting the I-485 applications. USCIS may also be conducting background clearances, and these are sometimes delayed. The agency wants to ascertain that applicants are not terrorists, have no criminal records or non-excludable criminal records, etc., before granting permanent residence. Dependents may also have had their own immigration file records in the past that USCIS will have to review before making a decision. It is not unusual that a principal applicant’s case will be adjudicated prior to that of the dependent.

Article: BEFORE FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE APPEARS, QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE EXECUTIVE ORDER OF JUNE 17, 2024, AFFECTING DACA HOLDERS AND OTHER UNDOCUMENTED UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE GRADUATES.

As published in the Immigration Daily on June 28, 2024

The June 18, 2024, fact sheet put out by the White House, FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces New Actions to Keep Families Together | The White House said that the announcement would allow individuals, including DACA recipients and other Dreamers, who have earned a degree at an accredited US institution of higher education in the United States, and who have received an offer of employment from a US employer in the field related to their degree, to more quickly receive work visas; and that recognizing that it is in our national interest to ensure that individuals who are educated in the US are able to use their skills and education to benefit our country, the Administration is taking action to facilitate the employment visa process for those who graduated from college and have a high skilled job offer, including DACA recipients and other Dreamers.

To facilitate this, the DHS Fact Sheet: DHS Announces New Process to Promote the Unity and Stability of Families | Homeland Security said that DHS will join the Department of State in an effort to more efficiently facilitate certain employment-based nonimmigrant visas for eligible individuals, including Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients and undocumented noncitizens, who have graduated from an accredited US institution of higher education – by clarifying and enhancing the existing process, the Department of State’s policy will give US employers increased confidence that they can hire the talent they need, and that they will be able to quickly get to work – and that DHS will implement the Department of State’s policy update.

Does the Administration plan to only utilize existing pathways of nonimmigrant visas? Or is there planning for another type of program like entrepreneur parole that was declared by Executive Order in President Obama’s Administration? If not, the more common visas would appear to be H-1B specialized occupation workers, O-1 extraordinary workers, and TN professional visas for nationals of Canada or Mexico. If confined to the existing pathways, it would appear that the numbers to be benefited will be not be large except for TN as many of the undocumented, DACA holders and other Dreamers are from Mexico. Most H-1B visas are capped at 85,000 per year, and with the number of applicants selected for FY 2025 registration thus far only 25.6% (120,603 of 470,342 registration candidates) https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/temporary-workers/h-1b-specialty-occupations-and-fashion-models/h-1b-electronic-registration-process, the addition of undocumented graduates without corresponding increase in H-1B numbers would only drive the percentage down. H-1B visas without numerical limit are available for cap-exempt employers, but those are confined to hirings by institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations affiliated with institutions of higher education, nonprofit research organizations, and government research institutes.

The H-1B of all existing pathways is the ideal vehicle except for the limited numbers of available visas. It has the advantage over other visas except for L-1 intracompany transferee visas (generally inapplicable to the situation because of the requirement of prior overseas one year employment as manager, executive, or specialized knowledge worker) of being a dual intent visa meaning that applicants can still receive visas although they have no intent to return to their home countries. This is not the case with other visas which either require nonimmigrant intent or exist in a gray area. TN requires nonimmigrant intent.

F-1 optional practical training (OPT) and the possible follow-up STEM OPT do not appear to be work visa options according to the stated requirement that applicants have a high skilled job offer from an employer as OPT is generally seen as training in which the applicant is gaining skills rather than using them professionally. In addition, it is a visa requiring nonimmigrant intent.

It appears at this stage that the Department of State is mainly contemplating traditional visas that are precipitated by USCIS approval on form I-129, which likely means H-1B and O-1 petitions generally. Its communiqué, Easing the Nonimmigrant Visa Process for U.S. College Graduates (state.gov) in answer to the question “How Can an Individual Apply for Petition-based Nonimmigrant Work Visa?”  said “Before an applicant can apply for an H-1B or other temporary worker visa, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) must generally first approve a petition for a nonimmigrant worker, form I-129… Individuals may apply for a nonimmigrant visa after USCIS has approved the petition…”

Assuming that work visa eligibility is established, coordination between DHS and the Department of State in the form of §212 (d) (3) expedited waivers of inadmissibility due to the 3 or 10 year bars attendant to remaining unlawfully in the US for six months or one year respectively after the age of 18 could solve the problem of return to the US on a temporary basis to work for undocumented graduates, but is there a contemplated solution for situations in which consular officers may have objections to the issuance of visas on other grounds? Would the failed applicants be allowed to return in some way?

For persons applying under TN, the Department of State would not be involved with waivers, and such would be a procedure handled solely by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through its Admissibility Review Office (ARO).

While we highly applaud the Administration’s initiative, we hope that it has considered or will consider the above while publishing its Federal Register notice in the near term.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on June 2, 2024 : 1. After filing form I-485, you are not allowed to leave the US without advance parole 2. If you are not planning to immediately go to the US, don’t file EB-1A too early 3. B visa holders should be wary about submitting adjustment of status applications within 90 days of entering the US. 4. If it has been more than 30 days since you received the email, and you have not yet received your receipt notice, you can request online 5. For personal case inquiries, it is best to contact the USCIS Contact Center

1. After filing form I-485, you are not allowed to leave the US without advance parole 

A reader asks:
I reviewed a copy of my filing papers today and I found two mistakes: 1. There were two addresses one in the United States and the other in China, both of addresses were put down as the present address. My lawyer discovered these problems before and I made the correction.  Unfortunately, the submitted paper was still incorrect. I worry it will affect my I-485 filing, and I must stay in the US for an RFE. 2. The preparer’s signature on the last page of I-485J was signed by my lawyer in 2022, while the previous pages were all dated 2023. I am going back to China next month, and I don’t know whether I should wait in China or not. At present, my lawyer has not responded to me whether it will have any impact. Please tell me, how deadly are the problems?

Alan Lee Esq. answers:
On your first mistake concerning your address on the I-485 application, USCIS will generally send all communications to both you and your attorney, and so if you do not receive a letter from USCIS, your lawyer will most likely inform you of its contents. I will also assume that USCIS believes that you are inside the United States since it did not reject the I-485 application, which can only be filed by individuals physically present in the country. On the second mistake of the I-485J signed by the lawyer in 2022, that is probably not a major problem as the signature date could have been a mistake. Otherwise, USCIS could RFE for a new form. Kindly note that after filing form I-485, you are not allowed to leave the US without advance parole unless on H-1B or L-1 visa.  If not in the 2 classes, leaving without an approved advance parole is grounds for canceling the I-485 application.

2. If you are not planning to immediately go to the US, don’t file EB-1A too early

A reader asks:
I am an associate professor in China, my job is ok, and I can apply for EB-1A, and I think I have a chance to get a green card. Even if I obtain a green card, I am unlikely to go to the United States immediately looking for a job, because my child is only 7 years old, and I plan for him to go to college in the future.  For my child, I want to apply for a green card. I would like to ask, is it too early to apply now?

Alan Lee Esq. answers:
The basis of all employment-based green card applications including EB-1A is that the individual will immigrate to use his or her talent and skill in this country. If you are not planning to immediately go to the US to find a position, then it would appear to be too early for you to apply for EB-1A status. Your concern appears to be your child going to college, and since most children here enter college around the age of 18, that is over 10 years according to your plan. An EB-1A case takes approximately 2-3 years if everything goes well, and so if you made the application now and are successful, you would have to figure out how to maintain your green card for 7-8 years before your child is of an age to enter college in the US.

3. B visa holders should be wary about submitting adjustment of status applications within 90 days of entering the US.

A reader asks:
B chart is current, but I am in mainland China. Does B1 visa holder must submit I-485 after 90 days of entering the United States? My lawyer told me that if the B chart was about to be closed, I could submit I-485 directly even it was within the 90 days period, and it should not be any problem. Will I-485 be approved only when the A chart is current?

Alan Lee answers:
Generally speaking, individuals on B visas should be wary about submitting adjustment of status applications within 90 days of entering the US. Although the 90-day rule has been largely disavowed, many immigration officers may believe the taking steps to submit I-485 applications within a short period of time of entering the States may be indicative of a misrepresentation at the time of entry that the individual had nonimmigrant intent to return to the home country. That being said, you may have misunderstood your lawyer and he or she may have considered the pros and cons and thought that in your case with Chart B of the visa bulletin (dates for filing chart) about to be closed, the better strategy would be for you to file even if within 90 days of entry. If you file for the adjustment of status before Chart B closes, you will have to wait until your priority date exceeds the date on Chart A (final action date chart) of the visa bulletin before your case can be approved.

4. If it has been more than 30 days since you received the email, and you have not yet received your receipt notice, you can request online

A reader asks:
I received an email reminder from the USCIS on January 17 that the filing fee and expedited money for my case have been deducted, but I have not yet received the receipt notice in the mail. The mailing address is the address of my house where my roommate has been. However, I have set up mail forwarding to forward emails to my wife. Now, neither side has received it. Is this normal?

Alan Lee Esq. answers:
I assume that by this time you have already received further word from USCIS, and that your question was sent within 2 weeks of you receiving the email from USCIS in January. If you have mail forwarding, the US Post Office forwards the mail to the location for forwarding. Although it does not forward certain documents from USCIS, it will generally forward a receipt. Please note that it takes time for USCIS to generate a physical receipt to send out, and it also takes the post office time to forward the mail. If it has been more than 30 days since you received the email, and you have not yet received your receipt notice, you can place an eRequest online at https://egov.uscis.gov/e-request/intro.do , then click on “did not receive notice by mail”. Go through the form, fill in all your needed information, and specify that you did not receive your receipt notice.  Hopefully, your situation will be resolved before you need to submit an eRequest, but by submitting an eRequest, you will alert USCIS that you still did not receive your notice.

5. For personal case inquiries, it is best to contact the USCIS Contact Center

A reader asked:
I am in China. About three or four years ago, I submitted I-140 at an immigration agency through a friend’s recommendation. I asked many times during this period, but the other party said that there was no result and it was still pending. I asked the other party for a receipt number, but they refused to give it. I suspected that it was never submitted. In the past few days, I asked the artificial Emma on the official website of the Immigration Bureau to check the receipt number. I changed to 4 different artificial Emmas and provided them with my name, birthday, mailing address etc. They all said that it could not be found in the system.  Is it possible to prove that it was not submitted? My friend said that since it has been submitted for so long, Emma should be able to find the receipt number through my information. Is this true?

Alan Lee Esq. answers:
Emma is not designed to locate applications or petitions for which there is no receipt. For personal case inquiries, it is best to contact the USCIS Contact Center telephonically at 1-800-375-5283 and explain your problem to the USCIS representative. I do note that contact representatives run the gamut from being very patient to impatient and that an impatient one may not be disposed to search the system to see whether a petition for you has been filed. Hopefully upon getting through, the representative will be helpful.

IMMIGRATION NEWS THAT YOU CAN USE – FORMAGEDDON STARTING ON JUNE 3, 2024; A BLAH FOR THE JUNE VISA BULLETIN; USCIS PUBLISHED PROCESSING TIMES A WASTE OF TIME FOR F-4 CASES?

As published in the Immigration Daily on May 23, 2024

  1. Formageddon Starting on June 3, 2024.

Formageddon is coming on Monday, June 3, as USCIS will require mandatory use of the 4/1/24 edition on over 50 forms on that day. Previously, the 4/1/24 edition was only mandatory on 4/1/24 for Forms I-129 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, I-129 CW Petition for a CNMI- Only Nonimmigrant Transitional Worker, I-140 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, I-600 Petition to Classify Orphan As an Immediate Relative, and I-600A Application for Advanced Processing of an Orphan Petition, So petitioners and applicants should check to ensure that the new form editions are being used on or after that date on the changing forms. This applies to popular forms like I-130 Petition for Alien Relative, I-485 Application to Register for Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, I-539 Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, and I-907 Request for Premium Processing, etc. It should be noted that USCIS generally uses the postmark date to determine the form edition. As per its 3/29/24 FAQs, https://www.uscis.gov/forms/filing-fees/frequently-asked-questions-on-the-uscis-fee-rule, the postmark date on couriers like FedEx is the shipping date reflected on the courier receipt, and if there is no shipping date on the label, USCIS considers the date the sender printed the label to be the postmark date. If the label does not have a shipping date or print date, USCIS would then consider the postmark date to be 10 days before it received the package.  And in an ironic twist, USCIS is replacing the 4/1/24 edition with one dated 5/6/24 of Form I-941 Application for Entrepreneurial Parole, even before the 4/1/24 edition becomes mandatory for use!

  1. A Blah for the June Visa Bulletin.

The June visa bulletin, https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2024/visa-bulletin-for-june-2024.html, had hardly any forward movement at all in both family-based and employment-based cases. A few of the relevant changes except for family-based changes for Mexico and Philippines-born were: FB (Family-based) final action dates: F-2A ROW (Rest of the World) moved up 5 ½ months to 11/15/21 and F-3 ROW two months to 3/1/10. FB dates for filing: F-3 ROW jumped three months to 9/1/10. EB final action dates: Nothing moved except India’s EB-3 and EB-3W moving one week to 8/22/12. EB dates for filing: no movement whatsoever. There are warnings in the visa bulletin that both EB-2 and EB-3 worldwide will most likely retrogress in July. For the month, USCIS continues to accept FB dates for filing and EB final action dates for applications for adjustment of status to permanent residence, https://www.uscis.gov/green-card/green-card-processes-and-procedures/visa-availability-priority-dates/when-to-file-your-adjustment-of-status-application-for-family-sponsored-or-employment-based-101 .

  1. USCIS Published Processing Times a Waste of Time for F-4 Cases?

The agency about a year ago revised its procedures to make it easier on its personnel and for the public when petitioners, applicants, and attorneys wish to check on the status of petitions and applications pending with USCIS. https://egov.uscis.gov/processing-times/. To that end, it gave processing time dates and even included at the bottom a specific date by which a formal inquiry could be made on a pending matter. We had occasion to interface with the system as USCIS’ published processing times (for 80% of its cases) have plummeted on F-4 I-130 sibling petitions in its service centers to within five years. The site indicates the service center in Nebraska is at 27.5 months, Potomac 42 months, Vermont 42.5, California 50, Texas 51.5, and NVC 55.5 months – and our clients with F-4 petitions pending since 2013 started calling. With the site allowing inquiries, we sent a number to the service centers only to receive the following common response:

Cases with F4 classification are considered to be out of processing time when they are still pending with USCIS and the visa bulletin date is less than one year ahead of your petition receipt date… Your case will be assigned to an adjudication officer no later than one year prior to the date of visa availability… If you have not received correspondence from USCIS within 45 days of the availability date, please check the USCIS website at www.uscis.gov or call the USCIS contact center at 800-375-5283 for updated processing time information.

The question is why USCIS would encourage F-4 petitioners, beneficiaries, and their representatives to inquire about the cases when it does not truly intend to work on them until the priority dates are close to becoming current. In the month of June 2024, the F-4 ROW date is only up to July 22, 2007, 16+ years away.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on April 7, 2024 : 1. An individual cannot leave the US prior to the advance parole being approved if intending to return on advance parole 2. A prevailing wage determination is required to begin the case 3. It is not a necessity to contact USCIS to cancel the F-1 approval if you have an I-485 receipt 4. EB-3 would typically take 3-5 years to complete

1. An individual cannot leave the US prior to the advance parole being approved if intending to return on advance parole

A reader asks:
Currently H-1B Extension has been Approved. The lawyer is preparing to submit I-485 this week, and plans to return home after having his fingerprints taken, which is expected to be at the end of November or early December. In the case of renewing a visa sticker in China, if you want to submit AP (double insurance) and leave the country before AP is approved, will the AP application be automatically canceled? It is said online that the AP’s pending departure will be canceled before approval, but will the AP’s pending departure be canceled if there is an H-1B?

Alan Lee answers:
The rules of advance parole are that an individual cannot leave the US prior to the advance parole being approved if intending to return on advance parole. We recently heard of a situation in which an individual did just that – file for advance parole, leave the US prior to its approval, and on returning to the US with a subsequently approved advance parole, had the I-485 adjustment of status application denied. Thus, having an advance parole is not double insurance if leaving before its approval. If approved before you leave, then it may very well be your double insurance. In the situation of an individual with valid H-1B visa and valid advance parole, the choice is up to that individual as to which document to use to reenter the US. We have heard tales that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers may express a preference as to which one they will be willing to accept, but generally, the choice will be yours where you have two valid documents for entry.

2. A prevailing wage determination is required to begin the case 

A reader asks,
I joined my current company in February 2022. Currently, companies require employees to work for one year before they can apply for a green card. Due to various reasons, I have delayed starting PWD until now. Now I have a few questions: 1. When is the salary of PWD determined based on the position? Is it the current job or the job when the company accepted me? I was promoted to Senior Researcher in August this year, so the two prevailing wages should be different. Are the YOE requirements on PERM calculated based on when you first joined the company? Previously, the company drew H-1B on a part-time basis. Although I have worked for two years, I do not have 2 years of experience. Will this affect PWD? Is it OK to get EVL before advertising? Is the PWD process not required?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Under PERM labor certification, a prevailing wage determination is required to begin the case to ensure that the employer will be paying prevailing wages for the offered position. The wage is based upon the position which is being offered in the labor certification application, not necessarily your current job. If you were promoted to senior researcher last year and the company is beginning your labor certification now, it should be sponsoring you for the job that it intends for you to take on permanently, and so should give the corresponding job description for the PWD determination. If experience is required, the company will also set the requirements there in terms of months or years. The requirements of course should ensure that you are eligible for your own labor certification in terms of education, experience, and special skills. In the labor certification application, the PWD is a required part of the process. In terms of obtaining an employment verification letter (EVL) before advertising, that is always a good idea, and an even better idea is to obtain one prior to sending in the PWD request.

3. It is not a necessity to contact USCIS to cancel the F-1 approval if you have an I-485 receipt

A reader asks,
My children are in college and their current status is H-4. Since I am about to turn 21, I submitted I-539 to USCIS in June to change status from H-4 to F-1. It was not approved in October, and I received an RFE saying I-20. If the start date has expired, the school will need to issue a new I-20, and you will also need to pay a student registration fee of 200 yuan. As a result, when the child was applying for a new I-20 with the school, we could submit the I-485, so after submitting the I-485 application, we no longer had to worry about the F-1 RFE. Currently, the I-485 receipt has been received, but the child’s F-1 has also been approved. We did not supplement the RFE and do not know why USCIS approved the F-1 in this case. After consulting with the school, the school said that the I-485 receipt can maintain legal status. So, do we need to contact USCIS to cancel F-1?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
The school’s advice is correct that the I-485 receipt of your child will allow the child to remain in the US as you all await the decision on your I-485s. It is not a necessity to contact USCIS to cancel the F-1 approval, and in some ways, it may be best not to do anything to disturb that adjudication. Whether your child decides to continue going to school or not will not affect his adjustment of status. Kindly note that he is not allowed to work unless he receives employment permission from the school or in connection with an employment authorization application based upon the adjustment of status application.

4. EB-3 would typically take 3-5 years to complete

A reader asks:
I studied for a PhD in China and am now a postdoc in the United States, with a contract until the end of next year. In May this year, I submitted NIW and it was approved. The boss of my laboratory has no grants recently, and he is not sure whether the contract can be renewed at the end of next year. I may need to return to China to wait for the appointment. I am a STEM major and have a 2-year residency requirement. My husband has a bachelor’s degree in China, and the American employer may want to apply for EB-3 for him in order to retain him. We are hesitant now and don’t know whether to let his boss do it for him. If so, what issues need to be paid attention to and considered?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Questions for you primarily depend upon whether you are able to obtain a waiver of the two-year home residence requirement, whether you will be able to keep up your activities in the NIW field, and what effect serving out the two-year residence in China if unable to obtain a waiver may have on your case. I assume that your NIW petition was a self petition, and not one in which the US employer was listed as the petitioner. In such former circumstance, you should continue to work in the field in which you received the I-140 approval and be ready to show a level of activity in your field at interview if you must return to China for two years.

With reference to your husband’s proposed EB-3 employment opportunity, that type of case would typically take 3-5 years to complete assuming no complications given the present slow speed of visa processing in that category for China born. If he is under J-2 dependent status, he will also have the same two-year home residence requirement. If so, and he has to serve the two-year residence requirement in China, he would be allowed to immigrate at the end as long as the employer is still willing to support his case. His EB-3 case would involve a PERM labor certification, I-140 petition, and either adjustment of status (if not subject to the two-year requirement or having a waiver of it) or consular processing.

An EB-3 case for your husband gives you and your husband two opportunities to immigrate to the US, although it may be longer timewise than yours. However, the time difference may not be that much due to due to employment category availability dates. In the month of April 2024, visa bulletin final action dates under which adjustment of status or consular processing cases can be finally approved for China born are up to February 1, 2020 for EB-2 and September 1, 2020 for EB-3.

IMMIGRATION NEWS THAT YOU CAN USE: THE ENDING OF THIS YEAR’S H-1B REGISTRATION– WHAT ARE YOUR ODDS? APRIL 1 –COMPLEX INTERTWINING OF NEW FEES AND FORMS FOR CERTAIN APPLICATIONS AND PETITIONS; APRIL VISA BULLETIN MOVEMENTS AND PROJECTIONS; AN UNWRITTEN RULE FOR CONSULAR PROCESSING; NEW WORRIES FOR CHINESE GRADUATE STUDENTS REENTERING US.

As published in the Immigration Daily on March 25, 2024

1. The Ending of This Year’s H-1B Registration– What Are Your Odds?

With the final registration filed before noon Eastern Standard Time on March 25, 2024, the book now closes on H-1B cap registrations for the year. Pending the results, USCIS appears to have done a good job in implementing the February 2, 2024 final rule, “Improving the H-1B Registration Selection Process and Program Integrity”. The most important part – a fix to cut down on the rampant fraud of past years when USCIS moved from a full paper petition- based filing registration system to one simply based upon organization registration and payment of a small $10 fee to identify each of its candidates – was implementation of the beneficiary centric process through selection by unique beneficiary rather than by the number of organization registrations. In such process, even if 25 organizations put in registrations for the same beneficiary, the system would only identify the beneficiary once for purposes of selection rather than giving the beneficiary 25 chances.

So what are the odds? USCIS gave its forecast of the number of registrations that it expected to receive in another final rule, “USCIS Citizenship and Immigration Services Fee Schedules and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements” on January 31, 2024 – 424,400. Assuming that the number is somewhat accurate, we believe that the percentage picked will be somewhere in the area of the low 30%’s based upon past selection records of the agency. Throwing out last year in which USCIS picked 188,400 after the hue and cry over the fraud which allowed 780,884 registrations, the average number of selections over the previous three years was 127,980 [1]. Such yields a selection rate of 30.15% of the 424,400 estimate, and would be an improvement over last year’s fiasco in which the selection rate was 24.1%. If the number selected is greater, or the number of individual beneficiaries less than estimated, the percentage of selection would be correspondingly higher than 30.15%. We can only hope.

Good luck to all participants in this year’s selection!

2. April 1 –Complex Intertwining of New Fees and Forms for Certain Applications and Petitions.

Unless blocked by litigation, the fee schedule implemented by the above final rule will come into effect on April 1, 2024. Many of the fee changes are straightforward, going from an old fee to a new fee, although some are humongous such as the fees for immigrant investors in which forms I-526 and I-526E for investors to file petitions either through individual or regional investment center investments move from $3,675 to $11,160 and for forms I-956 to apply for regional center designation and I-956F to request approval for investments in a commercial enterprise jump from $17,795 to $47,695.

The below are some of the more common petitions and forms that people use which not only feature changes in fee, but also tack on new charges to bring about more revenue to USCIS and/or to help cover the asylum program expenses.

  • I-130 – Increase of $90 for online filing ($625), $140 for paper filings ($675) (required for concurrent I-485 filings).
  • I-129 –H-1B – Increase of $320 on organizations with at least 26 ($780) and old fee of $460 for 25 and less and nonprofits + asylum program fee ($600 for employers with 26 employees, $300 with 25, and $0 for many nonprofits).
  • I-129 –L-1 – Increase of $925 for companies 26 and over ($1385) and $695 fee for 25 and under and nonprofits + asylum program fee ($600 for employers with 26 employees, $300 with 25, and $0 for many nonprofits).
  • I-129 –O-1 – Increase of $595 for companies 26 and over ($1055) and $530 fee for 25 and under and nonprofits + asylum program fee ($600 for employers with 26 employees, $300 with 25, and $0 for many nonprofits).
  • I-140 – Increase of $15 ($715) + asylum program fee ($600 for employers with 26 employees, $300 with 25, and $0 for many nonprofits).
  • I-485 – Increase of $215 for adults ($1440) and for child filing with one parent $200 ($950). For combination I-130/I-485 filings, $140 (I-130) plus $215 (I-485) = $355 more. Associated advance parole = $630 and EAD $260 (new fees).

Readers should check that the proper new fees are being submitted for cases postmarked to USCIS after March 31, 2024, to ensure that the petitions or applications are not rejected.

 3. April Visa Bulletin Movements and Projections.

The April Visa bulletin saw most movement in the Employment-Based (EB) final action dates chart with limited movement in the other three. Movement on the bulletin from March was as follows: FB (Family-based): B chart (dates for filing) India F-4 advanced one month two weeks to 4/8/06 and Philippines one year to 4/22/05. A chart (final action dates) F-2A advanced worldwide two months two weeks to 9/8/20 with the exception of Mexico which advanced two months to 8/15/20. EB (Employment-based) B chart (dates for filing) India EB-1 moved up three months to 4/1/21, its EB-3 advanced one month two weeks to 9/15/12 as did its EB-3W; EB-4 worldwide for ministers and for certain religious workers advanced 11 months to 12/1/20. A chart: (final action dates) China EB-1A advanced one month two weeks to 9/1/22 and India five months to 3/1/21; EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) advanced one month three weeks to 1/15/23 while China moved up one month to 2/1/20 and India one and ½ months to 4/15/12; EB-3 ROW moved one month two weeks to 11/22/22 and India advanced one month two weeks to 8/15/12; EB-3W ROW advanced one month to 10/8/20 and India one month two weeks to 8/15/12; EB-4 worldwide moved up 11 months to 11/1/20 and non-ministers went from 12/1/19 to unavailable. Unmentioned categories had no movement.

The State Department prediction of visa availability in coming months is that F-1 worldwide can advance up to three months; F-2A excluding Mexico up to six months; F-2B up to 10 weeks; F-3 several months; F-4 up to four weeks. In the EB categories, very little to no forward movement since the final action dates for many categories advanced for April 2024.

USCIS continued to use dates for filing for family-based cases and final action dates for employment-based in the month of April.

4. Unwritten Rule for Consular Processing.

In an AILA New York consular practice webinar in March, two former consular officers talked about unwritten rules and mentioned that it looks bad to the consulate when a person changes status in the US and then comes back for the visa because there is an intent issue with the consulate, especially where nonimmigrant intent is relevant, and this is a big no-no for people on tourist or business visas who may be able to get six months to stay, but the consular officer knows that most Americans would only stay a few weeks in a foreign country before going back.

5. New Worries for Chinese Graduate Students Reentering US.

This has become a hot button issue being reported on by the New York Times and Washington Post among others. Students and scholars from China with valid visas who take trips home are in danger of having their visas canceled and being sent home when they return to the US. This has happened to more than a dozen Chinese graduate students in PhD science programs at Yale, John Hopkins, and other major US research universities. In addition to having the visas canceled after being interrogated for hours, some wind up with a five-year ban on entry. Dulles Airport was reported as having the highest propensity to question and remove Chinese students so that the Chinese Embassy on January 29 warned Chinese students not to enter at that airport. Other mentioned airports in articles were Dallas-Fort Worth, Chicago O’Hare, and Boston Logan International Airport. For the foreseeable future, students and scholars from China in postgraduate science-related programs may wish to curtail nonessential trips back home.

[1] Figures from February 2, 2024 final rule, “Improving the H-1B Registration Selection Process and Program Integrity.”

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on March 24, 2024 : 1. USCIS would not expedite work authorization unless one of the five conditions exists 2. EB-1A denied, maybe wait until you have developed new circumstances that may strengthen your case before submitting a new petition 3. Whether to move forward now with NIW petition 4. The rescheduling of biometrics should not greatly affect the speed of your processing

1. USCIS would not expedite work authorization unless one of the five conditions exists

A reader asks:
I submitted I-485 for EB-1B in June. The main applicant has a work visa, which is still valid for more than two years. I would like to ask if it is possible for the secondary card to pass the expedited comb due to financial loss? Because if you review it carefully, you will probably find that the main applicant has a job. It is speculated that it may be helpful to have two children, which will make the burden heavier.

Alan Lee, Esq. answers:
It does not sound like financial hardship where your spouse already has a job and a work visa even if you have two children and a heavier burden. So that is not in my opinion a good reason to expedite your green card case. In addition, a dependent green card cannot be approved before that of the principal applicant. In your situation, it would appear that you can apply for employment authorization based upon the I-485 adjustment of status filing. If your husband is holding H-1B status, you are eligible to apply also for employment authorization as the spouse of a H-1B holder who has an approved I-140 petition. In both situations, USCIS would not expedite work authorization unless one of the following conditions exists:

  • Severe financial loss to a company or person, provided that the need for urgent action is not the result of the petitioner’s or applicant’s failure: (1) to timely file the benefit request; or (2) to timely respond to any requests for additional evidence;
  • Emergencies and urgent humanitarian reasons;
  • Nonprofit organization (as designated by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)) whose request is in furtherance of the cultural or social interests of the United States;
  • U.S. government interests (including cases identified as urgent by federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the U.S. Department of State (DOS), DHS, or other public safety or national security interests); or
  • Clear USCIS error.
2. EB-1A denied, maybe wait until you have developed new circumstances that may strengthen your case before submitting a new petition 

A reader asks:
I submitted EB-1A to TSC in July and responded to the request further evidence in August. I just learned that my EB-1A was denied. My attorney told me that the officer who adjudicated my case had an approval rate of 14% in 2023, so it was not surprising that my case was denied. However, my attorney suggested me to wait for 3 to 4 months before refiling to avoid the same officer to adjudicate my case again.

Now I have two choices: 1. Wait for 4 months before refiling to TSC; 2. Submit it now to NSC. I inquired my lawyer for advice and he told me he had no opinion and that I should make a decision on my own decisio. He just told me that my denial will not affect the next application, and whether a case is approved depends largely on the adjudicating officer.

Therefore, I feel like I should submit many applications as if you submit many application, even if I get denied many times, I just need to be lucky enough to be approved once. Please tell me, should I wait for another 4 months to refile again to TSC, or should I refile to NSC immediately?

Alan Lee, Esq. answers:
No one is certain of approval when submitting EB-1A petitions and how an officer may view the evidence presented of extraordinary ability short of a Nobel prize or Oscar (and we have heard of USCIS giving such a petition a difficult time even when the petitioner did have an Oscar in one of the nonmajor categories). I note that the I-140 petition requests information on prior filings which means that an officer has the opportunity to look over your past filing. Unless you truly believe that you had a very strong case that was wrongly rejected, our opinion is that you may wish to wait until you have developed new circumstances that may strengthen your case before submitting a new petition to USCIS.

3. Whether to move forward now with NIW petition

A reader asks:
My wife and I just came to the United States. We are currently studying for a Ph.D. and have some papers and citations. I have consulted with a lawyer and found out that I can apply for NIW under current conditions. I don’t know whether to apply as soon as possible or wait until I graduate soon? There are several tangled points: 1. According to the current queuing speed of NIW, will I not be able to get in line after completing my PhD? 2. The visa is for 5 years. If I apply for I-140, is there any risk in returning to my country? My wife is F-2, does it have no impact on her return to China?

Alan Lee, Esq. answers,
NIW is under the EB-2 category and the current date of availability (when an immigrant visa or adjustment of status can be granted for those who have approved NIW petitions with USCIS) is for petitions filed earlier than January 1, 2020. So there is a significant waiting time after submission of your case. That being said, having a PhD may strengthen the NIW petition, especially if the PhD is in the STEM sciences. So you should take these factors into account in deciding whether to move forward now with your NIW petition. The other factor that you ask about is the risk of traveling back to the home country, China, during the process as you have a visa for five years. Generally speaking, persons with visas do not have to apply for new ones at US consulates or embassies and do not experience problems coming back into the US. That being said, you may wish to keep abreast of developments involving Chinese students on PhD degree programs involving research, some of whom have been experiencing difficulties with Customs and Border Protection officers on reentering the country. That may apply more to you than to your wife, and I do not expect that that would be much of an issue if your wife is traveling alone.

4. The rescheduling of biometrics should not greatly affect the speed of your processing

A reader asks:
I estimate that I can pass form BROW and submit I-485 in October. However, due to an emergency at home, I plan to return to my country after submitting the I-485. The reserved H-1B has been checked, and it is very likely that I will not be able to take fingerprints in time, so I will most likely need to reschedule. My PD is September 12, 2022. ROW’s form A is not current yet. Will doing this cause it to turn green slowly?

Mr. Lee answers:
USCIS cannot approve an employment based I-485 until the priority date becomes current. Even then, USCIS has its own backlog processing time even when the date becomes current as it does not have enough hands to process all cases when they become current. So the rescheduling of biometrics should not greatly affect the speed of your processing even though the agency in our experience does not continue processing cases and their related applications until biometrics are completed. In the past, requesting rescheduling could sometimes result in cases being denied as USCIS officers did not coordinate the request for rescheduling with the application. That has hopefully been largely resolved by the agency’s recent update to rescheduling wherein applicants are invited to make their own online rescheduling requests to USCIS through their existing online account or by creating an online account. Good reasons for requesting a rescheduling as per the USCIS policy manual are:

  • Illness, medical appointment, or hospitalization;
  • Previously planned travel;
  • Significant life events such as a wedding, funeral, or graduation ceremony;
  • Inability to obtain transportation to the appointment location;
  • Inability to obtain leave from employment or caregiver responsibilities; and
  • Late delivered or undelivered biometric services appointment notice.