Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on August 24, 2025: 1. I am self-employed during my OPT period. Will this affect my I-485?

1. I am self-employed during my OPT period. Will this affect my I-485?

A reader asks:
Some articles mention that if one has fewer than 180 days of unauthorized work after the last U.S. entry, they can still adjust status under 245(k). But in my case, I was on OPT and self-employed, which led to unauthorized employment. I later left the country, and when applying for H-1B, I marked “No” on the DS-160 question about unauthorized work and did not list that experience. The H-1B got approved. Now, when I apply for EB-2, if I disclose the unauthorized employment, will this trigger a 212 fraud issue? Is the risk high? Am I basically out of options?

Alan Lee, Esq. answers:
The DS 160 form does not contain a question on unauthorized employment. It only has a question, “Have you ever been unlawfully present, overstayed the amount of time granted by an immigration official, or otherwise violated the terms of a U.S. visa?” Thus it does not appear that you made a specific misrepresentation to the question of unauthorized employment, especially if you doubted that your self-employment may have counted as unauthorized work at the time of making your visa application. Fraud or misrepresentation also requires an intentional misrepresentation of the truth. In this case, such is doubtful given that there is not a specific question on unauthorized employment on the DS-160 form. You are correct that §245K can forgive unauthorized work under 180 days, but has no impact on questions concerning fraud or misrepresentation. I doubt that the question of misrepresentation on your self-employment during OPT will be a deciding factor in your adjustment of status application.

Article: Cap Registration H-1B Selection Process More Likely to Become Wage-Based Than Random Selection After OMB Passage of Proposed Rule

As published in the Immigration Daily on August 21, 2025

On July 17, 2025, DHS submitted a proposed rule, “Weighted Selection Process for Registrants and Petitioners Seeking To File Cap‑Subject H‑1B Petitions” (RIN 1615‑AD01)—to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review,  OMB completed its review on August 8, 2025, and the rule has now moved back to USCIS. https://www.nafsa.org/regulatory-information/uscis-proposal-weighted-selection-h-1b-cap-subject-registrants-and?utm_source=chatgpt.com The next step is publishing the proposed rule in the Federal Register, triggering a formal public comment period. At this point of time early in the second Trump Administration, it is doubtful whether it can be halted if the Administration presses for its passage.

What will the proposed rule look like? We likely do not have to guess much as it will most probably mirror the proposed rule that was finalized in the last days of the first Trump Administration, but never enacted.

Three paragraphs from the summary, comments, and regulation sections of the earlier rule, “Modification of Registration Requirement for Petitioners Seeking to File Cap‑Subject H‑1B Petitions” 1/8/21, 86 FR 1676, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/08/2021-00183/modification-of-registration-requirement-for-petitioners-seeking-to-file-cap-subject-h-1b-petitions?utm_source=chatgpt.com give apt description of what we can expect in the upcoming proposed rule:

DHS is amending its regulations governing the selection of registrations submitted by prospective petitioners seeking to file H-1B cap-subject petitions (or the selection of petitions, if the registration process is suspended), which includes petitions subject to the regular cap and those asserting eligibility for the advanced degree exemption, to allow for ranking and selection based on wage levels. When applicable, USCIS will rank and select the registrations received generally on the basis of the highest OES wage level that the proffered wage equals or exceeds for the relevant SOC code in the area of intended employment, beginning with OES wage level IV and proceeding in descending order with OES wage levels III, II, and I. The proffered wage is the wage that the employer intends to pay the beneficiary. This ranking process will not alter the prevailing wage levels associated with a given position for U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) purposes, which are informed by a comparison of the requirements for the proffered position to the normal requirements for the occupational classification. This final rule will not affect the order of selection as between the regular cap and the advanced degree exemption. The wage level ranking will occur first for the regular cap selection and then for the advanced degree exemption….

… DHS recognizes that, under this final rule, it is less probable that USCIS will select registrations (or, if applicable, petitions) that reflect a wage level that is lower than the prevailing wage level II. DHS agrees with the comment that registrations (or, if applicable, petitions) reflecting prevailing wage levels II, III, and IV will have greater chances of being selected compared to the status quo. To the extent that recent foreign graduates, STEM-track or otherwise, in Optional Practical Training (OPT) can gain the necessary skills and experience to warrant prevailing wage levels II or above, the final rule may result in greater chances of selection of registrations (or, if applicable, petitions) for those beneficiaries. Further, recent graduates with master’s or higher degrees from U.S. institutions of higher education already benefit from the advanced degree exemption and cap selection order, as eligibility for that exemption increases their chance of selection. A registration or petition, as applicable, submitted on behalf of an alien eligible for the advanced degree exemption is first included in the submissions that may be selected toward the regular cap projection. If not selected toward the regular cap projection, submissions eligible for the advanced degree exemption may be selected toward the advanced degree exemption projection. This existing selection order increases the chance of selection for registrations or petitions submitted on behalf of aliens who have earned a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution of higher education….

If USCIS has received more registrations on the final registration date than necessary to meet the H-1B regular cap under Section 214(g)(1)(A) of the Act, USCIS will rank and select from among all registrations properly submitted on the final registration date on the basis of the highest OES wage level that the proffered wage equals or exceeds for the relevant SOC code and area of intended employment, beginning with OES wage level IV and proceeding in descending order with OES wage levels III, II, and I. Where there is no current OES prevailing wage information for the proffered position, USCIS will rank and select petitions based on the appropriate wage level that corresponds to the requirements of the proffered position. If USCIS receives and ranks more registrations at a particular wage level than the projected number needed to meet the numerical limitation, USCIS will randomly select from all registrations within that particular wage level a sufficient number of registrations needed to reach the numerical limitation.

With the total emphasis on higher wage/SOC level in the old rule which can be expected to be in the upcoming proposed rule, the question turns to how it will play out in March in the next H-1B selection if a new rule is implemented by then. The selection rate for this past March’s cap H-1B registration rose to 35.7% under the H-1B Modernization Rule which put many restrictions in place and raised the registration filing fee per applicant from $10 to $215. There were 336,153 eligible unique beneficiaries and 120,141 selections, leaving 216,012 unselected applicants. https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/temporary-workers/h-1b-specialty-occupations/h-1b-electronic-registration-process  Approximately 85,000 cap H-1B visas are awarded every year. There is as yet no discernible information on the split between those applicants who registered under the regular as opposed to the Masters cap nor the salary levels under which they registered. But given the percentages and the number of the non-selected, it would stand to reason that most if not all level I applicants would not be selected under a proposed new rule. Having to pay $215 for an almost certain “no” will severely depress the number of organizations willing to pay the fee for level I positions.

On the fate of the earlier rule, it was blocked in September 2021 by District Court Judge Jeffrey S.White in Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al, Case No. 4:20-cv-07331 (N.D.Ca. 9/15/21, https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/OPCZVAQ/Chamber_of_Commerce_of_the_United_v_United_States_Department_of_Homeland__candce-20-07331__0158.0.pdf, and withdrawn in December of that year https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/12/22/2021-27714/modification-of-registration-requirement-for-petitioners-seeking-to-file-cap-subject-h-1b-petitions. The timing of the earlier rule at the end of the first Trump Administration allowed the incoming Biden Administration to vacate the rule. Timing in the first year of the second Trump Administration will not be a factor.

However, it would be a tremendous shame to change to a wage-based selection process as geniuses are generally not identified by high wage levels coming out of colleges and universities, even on the Masters level, and to miss them and force them to leave the country would only weaken this nation’s ability to compete against the rest of the world, especially against our adversaries. Imagine personages like Albert Einstein, Bill Gates, or Elon Musk who did not astound with their academic genius in their universities, and what would happen if they were just graduating today (Bill Gates never graduated) and faced with the prospect of having to obtain a H-1B visa at the level III or level IV OES wage level to have the best shot of selection.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on August 17, 2025: 1. Under most circumstances, a new PERM filing must be made when the position changes 2. It is not necessary after extending the H-1B status for you to leave the US and obtain a visa in your passport

1. Under most circumstances, a new PERM filing must be made when the position changes

A reader asks:
I am on an H-1B visa. I feel that I have been in a rut in my current position for many years and have reached my career ceiling. I want to switch to a different career path for a fresh start. My company now has an open position at the same level as my current one but with different job responsibilities. My current role involves managing a department at the headquarters and its subordinate branches. The open position would be as the general manager of a subsidiary, overseeing all operations and department managers there, but only a small portion (20%) aligns with my current job responsibilities. I have an MBA and feel qualified for this role, which seems like a good opportunity. However, my green card application PERM was filed based on my current position. If I switch to this internal role, which is similar but not identical to my PERM application, would I need to refile for PERM?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
Under most circumstances, a new PERM filing must be made when the position changes. The exception is when the I-140 petition is approved and circumstances have changed after the I-485 adjustment of status application has been filed and 180 days have elapsed since that time. If the circumstance is a change of employment to a position which is in the same or similar occupation, both the PERM and I-140 petition can be kept and the adjustment of status application continue. That is the AC-21 portability law allowing a “same or similar” job switch. If that fits your situation, you may be able to port your case as both positions as described appear to be managerial, and it would be up to the company and its representative to bring out the most convincing arguments to USCIS that the job is in a similar occupation perhaps by arguing that the roles are in the same occupational classification; or that job duties and the SOC code are similar, etc.

2. It is not necessary after extending the H-1B status for you to leave the US and obtain a visa in your passport

A reader asks:
I applied for EB-3 professional immigration. After submitting I-485, the priority date retrogressed, so EB3 is no longer current. My Priority Date is May 2021. The current H-1B stamp will expire in three months. Should I go to Canada or somewhere like that to renew it early next year?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
It is not necessary after extending the H-1B status for you to leave the US and obtain the visa in the passport. The visa is only for travel purposes. Alternatively, you could also file for advance parole if you need to travel (currently takes about 6+ months to process) since you have already filed for adjustment of status to permanent residence. If you do decide that you wish to travel under H-1B status, you should check the consular post that you wish to visit to see whether they will entertain third country nationals at the US consular post, and make sure that you have all your proper documentation according to the consular checklist. Please note that unless you have advance parole, you would not be allowed to return to the US without obtaining the H-1B visa in your passport.

Alan Lee, Esq. Q&As published on the World Journal Weekly on August 3, 2025:1. Filing fee payment was processed. You can email USCIS if no receipt after 30 calendar days 2. For EB-1B, interviewers will ask about employment

1. Filing fee payment was processed. You can email USCIS if no receipt after 30 calendar days

A reader asks:
I recently applied for NIW from abroad. I can see that the $700 fee has been deducted, but I still haven’t received my receipt number. Today I asked Emma, provided my personal info, and they couldn’t locate my case—even though it’s been over a week since the payment was processed. How long does it usually take before Emma can provide the receipt number?

 Alan Lee, Esq. answers:
A lockbox can take 10–30 calendar days to cash the payment, assign the IOE/LIN/SRC/WAC receipt number, and push it into USCIS systems that Emma reads. One week is early; check again after another week. If you still have nothing at 30 days, then you can email the lockbox support address on the filing location webpage.

2. For EB-1B, interviewers will ask about employment

A reader asks:
I applied for I-140 last September and it was approved, my priority date was in December, and I did fingerprints in February this year. I recently checked the status and saw that my case is now in the interview stage.  How should I prepare the materials for an EB-1B family interview? What questions are usually asked during the interview?

Alan Lee Esq. answers,
For EB-1B (outstanding professor or researcher), interviews are generally employment-focused but also confirm the legitimacy of family members included. Prepare:

  • Employment documents: job offer letter confirming role, CV, portfolio if you have one, recent accomplishments.
  • Evidence of accomplishments in your field – if portable, bring some originals.
  • Family documents: marriage certificate, children’s birth certificates, photos, joint bank accounts, etc.

Interview questions may include:

  • Details of your job and role
  • Proof of bona fide marriage/family (if applicable)
  • Memberships in organizations.
  • Social media postings.
  • All relevant questions on form DS-260.

Good luck with your interview.